Search for: "DJ (I)" Results 861 - 880 of 1,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2012, 6:34 pm by FDABlog HPM
  The court’s decision sets up the possibility of a subsequent ANDA sponsor causing a 180-day exclusivity forfeiture event for a first applicant under the failure-to-market provisions at FDC Act § 505(j)(5)(D)(i)(I). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm by David Lat
Stewart — not a DJ, but a lifelong guitar player — released an album entitled Enjoy the Ride. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:23 pm by Tom Smith
In Lochner's vacant place, I hereby recommend one such zero-arguments-for case, Griswold v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:50 am by NL
After the 28 days, Crawley obtained a warrant.Ms N applied to stay the warrant and another DJ granted a stay. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:50 am by NL
After the 28 days, Crawley obtained a warrant.Ms N applied to stay the warrant and another DJ granted a stay. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 3:22 pm by Bystander
I was surprised to see that one of the driver's bail conditions, imposed by a DJ(MC) was not to drive any motor vehicle. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 5:27 am by pfriedman
“Although we felt tracks like our ‘What Would You Think If I Sang AutoTune’ were clearly parody as well as Fair Use, the legal types thought they were lawsuit-bait. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:02 pm
Monoclonal Antibod-ies, Inc., 802 F.2d 1367, 1384 (Fed. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 10:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
If for some reason I am wrong, I would refuse the appeal for the same reasons. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 5:16 am by NL
Therefore, I find that that ground also fails.The CJ found that the DJ had properly taken into account Pinnock and Powell, and that his decision that possession was proportionate was within the ambit of a reasonable view, having considered Mr O’s circumstances. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 5:16 am by NL
Therefore, I find that that ground also fails.The CJ found that the DJ had properly taken into account Pinnock and Powell, and that his decision that possession was proportionate was within the ambit of a reasonable view, having considered Mr O’s circumstances. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
She argued that the effect of the occupation order made in the Family Law Act case meant that when the NTQ expired “the effect of the occupation order made by DJ Bowman, which was in force at that time, was that Ms Boyle was deemed to be in occupation of the Property as her only or principal home, and so she remained a secure tenant. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
She argued that the effect of the occupation order made in the Family Law Act case meant that when the NTQ expired “the effect of the occupation order made by DJ Bowman, which was in force at that time, was that Ms Boyle was deemed to be in occupation of the Property as her only or principal home, and so she remained a secure tenant. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 12:35 pm by familoo
So, whilst I’m grateful for the tip off, I think this post will be disappointing to anyone hoping for 10 entertaining reasons why Martin Narey is a ****. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 8:09 am by Dan Markel
It makes me think of the story about the South African radio station trying to stigmatize men who, on account of their philandering, were introducing HIV to their spouses; the radio djs called out the men for bad behavior on the radio station. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:56 pm by Lara
 I’m left to wonder which party’s tune will resonate most with the federal court. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:34 pm by SJM
Minter v Mole Valley District Council was heard by DJ George on 25th May 2011 and it was reported in the papers here. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:34 pm by SJM
Minter v Mole Valley District Council was heard by DJ George on 25th May 2011 and it was reported in the papers here. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 12:48 pm by David Smith
We have previously written about this case here and so I will not go into it again. [read post]