Search for: "Davis v. THE STATE"
Results 861 - 880
of 6,201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2018, 4:29 pm
Jurors must be trusted to faithfully adhere to their duties (R v B). [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 11:20 am
Justice Ginsburg with opinion in Fort Bend County, Texas v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 6:31 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 5:03 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 12:46 pm
Arizona v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 11:14 am
LINDA DAVIS V. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:27 pm
After Wal-Mart v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:56 pm
Soverain Software v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:36 am
Davis of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has set up a clash between judges in that district over whether Virginia recognizes the “independent personal stake” exception to the intra-corporate immunity or intra-corporate conspiracy doctrine. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 6:50 am
The case is entitled Associated General Contractors of America et al. v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 1:30 am
Michelle Davis won in State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 10:03 am
That strategy takes advantage of a practice encapsulated in a case concerning coroners, R (Davies) v Birmingham Deputy Coroner [2004] 1 WLR 2739, which is that courts and tribunals will not usually be ordered to pay costs provided they have maintained a neutral stance. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 6:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:22 am
Here is the opinion in State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:13 am
In Davis v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:13 am
In Davis v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 11:48 am
From Davis v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 12:12 pm
On Tuesday of this week, the en banc Eleventh Circuit will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:12 am
Davis that when a state prisoner fails in a state post-conviction proceeding to challenge the effectiveness of his direct-appeal lawyer, he may not raise that claim in a federal habeas petition – even if his failure was caused by ineffective assistance of his post-conviction counsel. [read post]
