Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 861 - 880
of 29,807
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2016, 5:54 am
GSE Lining Tech., Inc., 383 F.3d 1303, 1311 (Fed. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:46 pm
"The problem with the Defendant's Motion is that it seems to assume that by simply stating and presenting its defenses it has met its summary judgment burden of negating the existence of the objective prong of the [In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 7:10 am
"[W]hile the term 'patent troll' describes entities that engage in negative, even aggressive, behavior, it is not so extreme or salacious that it warrants an exercise of the Court's discretion under [Rule 12(f)]. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 4:59 am
United States, 127 F. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 4:44 am
Bailbondsman was the citizen informant on defendant's stop, but the bondsman mistook defendant for another person. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 7:14 am
” Candelaria-Gonzalez, 547 F.2d at 294; see Guzman, 167 F.3d at 1352. [read post]
28 May 2023, 3:05 pm
Co., 527 F.2d 1308 (5th Cir. 1976), the controlling factor whether a person is an employee or independent contractor is whether, “as a matter of economic reality,” a worker is “dependent upon the business to which they render service. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 2:24 pm
City of Union City, Georgia, 918 F.3d 1213 (11th Cir. 2019). [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:00 pm
Both sets of defendants moved for qualified protective orders to conduct these interviews, pursuant to § 29-26-121(f), which plaintiffs opposed. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:00 pm
Both sets of defendants moved for qualified protective orders to conduct these interviews, pursuant to § 29-26-121(f), which plaintiffs opposed. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 3:02 pm
The complainant's statement to the police on November 8, 2002, in which she never even mentioned the defendant, was not a "report" within the meaning of CPL 30.10(3)(f). [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 10:54 pm
Kent, 531 F.3d 642, 648-49 (8th Cir. 2008); United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 3:55 pm
The post An Analytical Framework for Defending COVID-19 Claims Under LHWCA appeared first on MBLB. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
AT & T Mobility LLC, 530 F.3d 293, 299 (4th Cir. 2008), the Fourth Circuit found the defendant’s showing sufficient to establish the amount in controversy under CAFA when the plaintiffs had “offered nothing” to challenge the accuracy of the defendant’s affidavit. [read post]
13 May 2010, 5:30 am
Shorts, 552 F.3d 327, 333, 36 (4th Cir. 2008), which held that U.S.C. 28 § 1441(a) did not permit removal by a counter-defendant because under Shamrock Oil,counter-defendant is not a ‘defendant’ allowed to remove a case under § 1441(a). [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:07 am
Limelight Networks, Inc., 692 F.3d 1301 (Fed. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 12:45 pm
Chisom, 501 F.3d 920 (8th Cir. 2007) (stating that requiring express statement that defendant is sued in individual capacity is consistent with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:14 pm
Joseph, 333 F.3d 598 (5th Cir. 2003). [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 12:36 pm
Loose, 569 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir. 2009). [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:45 am
Ernst & Young, LLP, ___ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. 8/21/13) is another case addressing whether a defendant can bring or renew a motion to compel arbitration in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
