Search for: "DirecTV" Results 861 - 880 of 927
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
.: Which means we can file a putative class-action lawsuit on behalf of all municipalities in Illinois seeking hefty fees from Netflix, Disney, Apple, Hulu, Amazon, WarnerMedia, YouTube, Peacock TV, DIRECTV, DISH Network, CuriosityStream, and CBS Interactive, right? [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
DirecTV Group, Inc., 523 F.3d 1323, 1334-35 (Fed. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:13 pm by Adam Thierer
I remember how the Powell FCC was under real heat to “get tough” on mergers back in 2001-02 and during that time blocked the proposed DirecTV-EchoStar deal, possibly as a result of the pressure. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 7:15 pm
DirecTV Group, Inc., 523 F.3d 1323, 1334-35 (Fed. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 1:42 pm by Adam Thierer
  Those who lost their shirts on the failed AOL-TimeWarner and NewsCorp-DirecTV deals can attest to how illusive those so-called “synergies” can be when two very different media operations and cultures are merged. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:04 am
DirecTV Group Inc. was just one of a burgeoning number of blockbuster verdicts in intellectual property cases. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
Todd Dickinson’s comments at Bio Conference (IAM) The Charles Rivers Ventures connection – CRV stakes in RPX Corp, Thinkfire and Intellectual Ventures (IAM) Obama Administration tackling patent backlog (IP Watchdog) Patent examiners told to issue patents (IP Watchdog) More funding needed for patent granting authority (IP Watchdog) Short note on patentability of product-by-process claims – Newman J’s opinion in 1985 case In re Thorpe: Abbott v Sandoz (Peter… [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the April 13, April 21 and April 28 conferences)   DIRECTV Group Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:30 am by Bruce Colbath
On Tuesday, July 29, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit “clarified certain aspects of [its] false advertising jurisprudence” and held that, where literal falsity and deliberate deception have been proved in a market with only two players, it is appropriate to use legal presumptions of consumer confusion and injury for the purposes of finding liability in a false advertising case brought under the Lanham Act.[1] 1. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 8:39 pm
  TV has its own copyright issues, as the law permitting Dish and DirecTV to import local broadcast stations into local markets must be renewed, and some have suggested that this might be the time to reexamine the must-carry and retransmission consent process for both cable and satellite. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Katya Assaf, Magical Thinking in Trademark Law We’re supposed to be rational, but in fact Westerners are just as likely to believe in magical thinking as members of supposedly less rational cultures. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/NdNQPS0nfw -> Why Google’s Fair Use Victory In Google Books Suit Is A Big Deal–And Why It Isn’t http://t.co/3Uh3WJ0MV7 -> Contrasts in Culture http://t.co/f1h2u9oYAJ -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-12-04: Analysis of admissibility of electronic evidence in Animal W… http://t.co/slnUBrwLG7 -> AG outlines ALRC recommendations in response to question without notice Australian Copyright Council http://t.co/BDCBdl4Ic4 -> Imagine Canada:… [read post]