Search for: "District of Columbia v. Heller" Results 861 - 880 of 1,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2012, 11:42 am by Lyle Denniston
The Nordyke case had begun as an attempt to gain Second Amendment protection for possession of guns, going to court initially almost nine years before the Supreme Court ruled in District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 8:02 am by Amy Howe
” Wallace pressed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to explain her opposition to the court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:25 pm by Jeff Gamso
Heller in which he wrote the majority opinion and Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 10:00 am by Michelle Ghetti
And, although Chief Justice John Roberts joined the majority opinions in both District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
” The Court first ruled in 2008 that the Second Amendment guarantees a personal right to have a gun for self-defense, at least in the home (District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 1:57 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The state Supreme Court called up the case for direct review, solely to decide the impact on state and local gun control laws of the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:08 am by Jeff Welty
By way of background, recall that the Supreme Court decided in District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 10:42 am by Joseph Greenlee
By the time Bruen was decided, with few exceptions, the lower courts had essentially limited the Second Amendment to protecting the possession of handguns in the home — the narrowest possible reading of District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by John Elwood
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 5:04 am by jonathanturley
In 2008, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 4:40 am by SHG
Back in January, I devoted my first column of the new year to the growing impatience of some members of the court for a chance to move the boundaries of the Second Amendment from the home — where its 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]