Search for: "Doe v. United States" Results 861 - 880 of 44,074
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2008, 5:21 am
Although the First Circuit does not cover this aspect in its recent decision in the United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:20 am by constitutional lawblogger
As we most recently discussed, on a remand from the United States Supreme... [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm by David Gans
EMA, concerning the constitutionality of state regulation of violent video games, and McComish v. [read post]
§ 1447(d) generally provides that “an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal,” the United States Supreme Court explained in Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
United States, the Federal Circuit held that a pharmaceutical manufactured in the United States qualified for sale, under the TAA, to the Department of Veterans Affairs even though the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) came from a non-designated country, India. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am by Josh Blackman
Indeed, this admonition sheds light on the Supreme Court’s unsigned order from December  in In Re United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:52 am by David Duncan
  So, despite state court precedent, albeit from an intermediate court, holding that ABDW does not have two separate branches proved by separate elements, the First Circuit concluded that ABDW is divisible and thus does have two separate branches, with two different sets of elements. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:52 am by David Duncan
  So, despite state court precedent, albeit from an intermediate court, holding that ABDW does not have two separate branches proved by separate elements, the First Circuit concluded that ABDW is divisible and thus does have two separate branches, with two different sets of elements. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 2:06 am by Michael DelSignore
Additionally, the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article Twelve of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights guarantees a defendant’s right to confront a witness at trial. [read post]