Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 861 - 880 of 13,844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2012, 12:01 am by tekEditor
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 # License: Public Domain.# Author: Joseph Wecker, 2012# Are you tired of trying to remember what .bashrc does vs .bash_profile vs .profile? [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:24 pm
According to the EU, the US does not have “adequate” data protection. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:23 am by Jani
In the absence of a judgment in English (which this writer was waiting for) the information conveyed in this post has been parsed from several sources; however hopefully represents an accurate reading of the case.The question posed to the Court was simple: "Does the embedding, within one’s own website, of another person’s work made available to the public on a third-party website... constitute communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of… [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 2:43 pm by Michael Viola
Seal is not the biological father of this child, although he was present at the child’s birth and married Heidi 1 year after the child was born. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
The common reading of the ECJ's (yes) recent judgment in case C-367/15 - OTK is that the Enforcement Directive (Directive 2004/48) does not compel Member States to introduce punitive damages for infringement of intellectual property rights, but allows for national law to impose punitive damages (see, e.g., the case reports on IPKat or Kluwer Patent Blog). [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:18 am by Anna Carrier (BE)
The draft guidelines consist of the following: Guideline 1: General. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 5:44 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
On November 29, 2011, the Federal Trade Commission announced that Facebook has settled charges that it deceived consumers by making false privacy promises. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:45 am
If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative, does the fact that there has been an alteration as referred to in Question 1 have any bearing on the answer to the question whether exhaustion within the terms of Article 4(2) of the Copyright Directive is hindered or interrupted? [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:21 am
Merpel says, does this mean that if you can't realistically stop it, you should legalise it? [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:36 am
LEXIS 78 (March 29, 2011).* Defendant’s argument that a federal search warrant violated state law was irrelevant. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 5:56 am
Being directed to roll down the windows at the time of the stop does not offend the Fourth Amendment. [read post]