Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 861 - 880
of 11,129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm
The statement by a majority does not equate to unanimous approval by all parties. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 11:18 pm
’(The Sun Daily, 22/1/2018). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
The Texas Supreme Court held that Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 51.016 does not allow an interlocutory appeal of an order appointing an arbitrator. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 12:35 pm
Thus, it asked the CJEU to answer the following questions:1) Does the hiring out of cars which are equipped as standard with radio receivers mean that the person who hires the cars out is a user who makes a communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29 and within the meaning of Article 8(2) of Directive 2006/115? [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 5:00 am
Answer #1 It depends. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Answer #1 It depends. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 12:17 pm
—Austin July 27, 2005, no pet.) [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 10:54 am
[1] Comments of Brian C. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 7:48 am
” Slip op. at 27. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 12:45 pm
The statute identifies when such drugs are appropriate: (1) To justify the use of anti-obesity drugs as set forth above, the patient must have an initial Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or above, or an initial BMI of greater than 27 with at least one comorbidity factor, or an initial measurable body fat content equal to or greater than 25% of total body weight for male patients or 30% of total body weight for women. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 12:45 pm
The statute identifies when such drugs are appropriate: (1) To justify the use of anti-obesity drugs as set forth above, the patient must have an initial Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or above, or an initial BMI of greater than 27 with at least one comorbidity factor, or an initial measurable body fat content equal to or greater than 25% of total body weight for male patients or 30% of total body weight for women. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm
So the top 1% paid their fair share and the fair share of 23.6 other people. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 9:24 am
Directing the county how it may use its money, as section 1 does, expressly negates the portion of the budgetary ordinance that establishes funding for all of the Task Force’s recommendations, including CHEL sites. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:33 pm
The Court’s March 27, 2019 opinion in Lorenzo v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 10:53 pm
App. 1, 740 P.2d 1224, 1226-27 (1987): The decisive issue is not, as the trial court apparently thought, one of federal law. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 10:01 am
The Bible discourages selfish (2 Timothy 3:1-9) false (Exodus 23: 7), or vengeful (Romans 12:19) motivations and provides direction (Proverbs 1:5; 27:23-24 & Eccl. 11:2) while encouraging stewardship (1 Timothy 5:8). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 4:45 am
Section 14-27 of the Pasco County, Florida, Code of Ordinances, provides definitions for the following types of animals: 1. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:03 pm
Here are your "how do you seek fees and costs in a Hawaii eminent domain case" talking points: The 101-27 damage issue does not become ripe until it is determined the property will not or cannot be taken. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
The underlying patent application was filed on 17 April 2001 and claims priority from EP 00113608.4 filed on 27 June 2000 by Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A..Independent claim 1 as granted read as follows:"1. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:55 pm
’896 patent, col. 10, lines 27–53. [read post]
