Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 861 - 880
of 12,431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
If Question 1 is answered in the negative: 2.1 Does a scheme establish 'fair compensation' for the purposes of Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC if the right specified in Question 1(a) applies only where recording media are marketed to natural persons who use the recording media to make reproductions for private purposes? [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 7:30 pm
FDA does not intend to take action to enforce the requirements, as described below, until November 27, 2024. [read post]
8 May 2015, 4:30 am
Here's what the legislature's website says happened to the rest of the pro-employee bills (hint: unless it says it was presented to the Governor or the Governor signed it, it's dead):Overtime: HB 455 - Labor RegulationsGeneral Bill by CampbellLabor Regulations: Designates act as "Florida Overtime Act of 2015"; revises number of hours of labor that comprise legal day's work; revises rates of overtime compensation for labor performed in excess of certain of hours of… [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 9:12 am
1.) [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:21 pm
” Lawdiva aka Georgialee Lang, happily married for 27 years! [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 3:09 pm
FDA states that trading partners should make a determination (presumably after November 27, 2018) based on whether: (1) At least one of the transaction information documents (the transaction history) for the product describes an initial transaction date from the manufacturer as one that occurs between November 27, 2017 and November 26, 2018; or (2) there is other documentary evidence created by a trading partner “in the ordinary course of business” that… [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
[27] Id [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:24 am
(See my post of April 27, 2008: profit center with 18 references.). [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:25 am
Moreover, although it was accepted that claim 1 of the main request did not cover the third embodiment depicted in figure 5, there was still a general basis in the section "SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION" on pages 2 to 5.More particularly, the features of the housing and the display member in threaded engagement with each other were based on page 6, line 32, to page 7, line 3, in connection with the first embodiment of the invention and, implicitly, on page 2, lines 17 to 27,… [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:25 am
Moreover, although it was accepted that claim 1 of the main request did not cover the third embodiment depicted in figure 5, there was still a general basis in the section "SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION" on pages 2 to 5.More particularly, the features of the housing and the display member in threaded engagement with each other were based on page 6, line 32, to page 7, line 3, in connection with the first embodiment of the invention and, implicitly, on page 2, lines 17 to 27,… [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 9:17 pm
Aug. 1, 2014).Issues[1] [A]ll asserted claims of the ’065 Patent require the use of accounting information to “enhance” a network accounting record. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:35 pm
Milligan is the most important shadow docket entry since John Does 1-3 v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 9:02 am
Potential changes to legislation (Article 27(6) of MiFID II – level 1) and thereafter consequential changes to RTS 28. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 10:59 am
It does not grant another 10, 15, or 30 days to file. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 5:13 pm
Aronson, --- So.3d ----, 2010 WL 4226204 (Fla. 3d DCA Oct 27, 2010) In July of 1996 Mr. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 5:45 am
But this argument does not hold water. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 8:03 am
DOES DEFAULT TRIGGER THE RUNNING OF LIMITATIONS PERIOD? [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 5:26 am
After this Friday, the court does not have a regular conference scheduled until Jan. 5. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:39 pm
The cases are consolidated and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted limited to the following questions: 1) Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex? [read post]
7 May 2018, 2:53 pm
That was enough to convince the Archivist of the United States, who is charged under 1 U.S.C. [read post]
