Search for: "Does 1-32"
Results 861 - 880
of 5,933
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2009, 9:45 am
The ECJ gave its answer today in impeccable German: "Articles 10(1) and 12(1) ... must be interpreted as meaning that, where the proprietor of a mark affixes that mark to items that it gives, free of charge, to purchasers of its goods, it does not make genuine use of that mark in respect of the class covering those items".The IPKat isn't hugely happy with this answer. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
Does 1-168; Serious Bidness LLC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 5:06 pm
At issue was Article Article 11355 of the Polish Code of Civil Procedure, which provides: 1. [read post]
11 May 2009, 2:21 am
The new clause states that: (1) A person (A) discriminates against a disabled person (B) if (a) A treats B in a particular way, (b) because of B’s disability, the treatment amounts to a detriment, and (c) A cannot show that the treatment is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if A shows that A did not know, and could not reasonably have been expected to know, that B had the disability. (3) It… [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
Since Fan Milk’s trade marks were for goods described in Class 29, 30 and 32 and Mandarin Oriental’s proposed mark was for services (not goods) described in Class 43 in Suit 791 and Class 36 in Suit 792, registration could not be rejected. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:02 am
On March 8, the National Assembly adopted this language (see “Article 4 quinquies”) when it passed the bill by a vote of 474 to 32, with 32 abstentions. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:30 pm
Hubert, who was sentenced to serve a 32-year prison sentence in 2016. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:54 am
at 32. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 10:13 pm
See AB 32. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 10:51 am
HB 1390 that has passed the House does not have a time limit for harvest reporting and provides: 8 SECTION 1. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:00 am
This is determined by referencing s 1 of the Estate Administrations Tax Act, 1998 (the "Act") with s 32 of the Estates Act, 1990. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:00 am
My broker does not charge me annually a marketing fee associated with that initial sale. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 10:13 pm
See AB 32. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:23 am
National Football League, No. 08-661, appears at 2010-1 Trade Cases ¶77,019. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:16 pm
Love the remodel. 1:30: Return guests to law school. 1:55: Back home. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Federalist 32. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 6:20 am
Columbia Dental, P.C., No. 3:18-CV-01390 (VLB), 2022 WL 168967, at *1–2 (D. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:43 am
[FN 32]***For the record,Footnote 32, as submitted to JPTOS, stated:See also Varco v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 2:29 pm
” Id. at *32. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 10:49 pm
Does Art.32 really require that there be a means of judicial review of this? [read post]
