Search for: "Does 1-44"
Results 861 - 880
of 4,339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2011, 10:39 am
Oddly, the Means Test form B22C does not have a line for deducting our fees. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
The court, based on the clear wording of the statute, had to conclude that an arbitration award did not fall within this language (para. 44). [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 3:58 am
(FHH does not represent clients in this proceeding.) [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:06 pm
[1] The CEQA Guidelines provide that an exemption does not apply to rates used for system expansion, and that if the lead agency does rely upon an exemption then the lead agency is required to set forth the basis for the exemption with specificity. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:43 am
Unfortunately, a decline in income due to changes in investment returns does not qualify as a life changing event. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:11 am
Heir which indicates that Rule 7-1(1)(a)(i) would automatically force a litigant to list relevant documents in a civil suit notwithstanding the implied undertaking of confidentiality. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
IN THE MATTER OF DOE Between October 2001 and September 2009, the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare received eighteen referrals regarding Jane and John Doe and the care of their children. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:39 am
Oddly, the Means Test form B22C does not have a line for deducting our fees. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:06 pm
City of Newark, 90 N.J. 44 (1982). [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 7:23 am
Under §7(e) of the Trademark Act, a registration based on an application under §1 or §44 of the Trademark Act may be amended for good cause upon application of the owner and payment of the prescribed fee, provided the amendment does not materially alter the character of the mark. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 4:18 am
That conclusion, likely not too shocking to anyone, is the following: less conventional marks remain (very) difficult to register.The rise of the substantial value groundOne issue is the growing relevance of the absolute ground for refusal/invalidity concerning signs that consist exclusively of a shape or another characteristic that gives substantial value to the goods (Article 7(1)(e)(iii) EUTMR/4(1)(e)(iii) EUTMD).Such a ground, considered quite niche if not altogether… [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 12:26 am
Notably, it was raised that registering the mark under 'apparatus for locomotion by air and/or water' would be free from objection under s3(1)(b) and (c), as set out in the past case of Jaguar Land Rover Ltd v OHIM regarding a different JLR product [however, this point does arise later, under different circumstances...]Acquired distinctiveness - From Windsurfing Chiemsee, acquired distinctiveness is found if:"the competent authority finds that the relevant… [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 1:27 pm
§ 16(a)(1)(B), and that provision does not provide any map to Federal Circuit jurisdiction. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:03 am
. _____,_____, 126 S.Ct. 528, 44 IDELR 150 (2005).Section 615 of the IDEA is entitled “Procedural Safeguards,” and most procedural safeguards for parents are contained in that section. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 8:40 am
Does his answer at the Article 32, UCMJ investigation constitute a prior inconsistent statement under Rule 801(d)(1)(A)? [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 11:39 am
The Corps is soliciting comments until August 1, 2016. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 2:58 pm
The one exception I am prepared to make in favour of print over online is where the online version does not have paragraph numbering. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 11:39 am
The Corps is soliciting comments until August 1, 2016. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 1:35 pm
(But yeah, New Haven kinda does suck. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:59 pm
" The May 20, 2008 CMS policy memo does not mention annuities or structured settlements or rated ages. [read post]
