Search for: "Does 1-96" Results 861 - 880 of 2,165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2022, 10:52 am by Eugene Volokh
" To support that statement, footnote 1 cites the U.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Nowhere does the record identify those state agency requirements, and defendants cite no statute, rule, or regulation from which the requirements may be judicially noticed. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In summary, A 113(1) does not merely require a party to be given an opportunity to voice comments; more importantly, it requires the deciding instance to demonstrably hear and consider them (T 763/04 [4.4]; T 246/08 [2.6]). [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
The Judge found that Facebook “has considerable resources at its disposal and does not require to have spelled out to it on each occasion with inappropriate precision the particular laws of the UK which are in issue and which are being contravened” ([96]). [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:50 am by Eric Goldman
Consequently, the record does not contain enough evidence for this Court to determin [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 10:11 am by News Desk
The seven additional E. coli cases have been reported from California (1), Illinois (1), Maryland (1), Ohio (2), Pennsylvania (1), and Washington (1) since the last update on Nov. 20, CDC noted. [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Enjoy.The appeal was against the revocation of the patent under consideration by the Opposition Division (OD).Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:1. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:01 pm
Burns, No. 07-5942 Dismissal of pro se prisoner's civil rights action against fourteen judges and justices of various Tennessee courts in their official capacities is affirmed in part and vacated in part where: 1) contrary to the ruling below, the Rooker-Feldman doctrine does not apply to plaintiff's facial constitutional challenge to Tennessee statutes governing collateral review; but 2) an as-applied challenge was barred under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 8:30 am
NMa is all about what constitutes a concerted practice according to Article 81 §1 EC. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 5:10 am
Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, LLP, 96 NY2d 300, 303 [2001]; Leon v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:17 am by Jan von Hein
Since the Romanian Government does not give any reason why recognition should not be granted, there should be no obstacle to automatic recognition. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:21 am by Patti Spencer
The 1995-96 amnesty waived penalties but required full payment of taxes and interest. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 6:16 pm
They claimed that they misunderstood the requirements of Section 1(a), did not understand the legal meaning of "use in commerce," and "honestly believed that their ownership of the same mark in Australia and their use in commerce of such mark in Australia justified their Section 1(a) filing in the U.S. [read post]