Search for: "Drewes v. State" Results 861 - 880 of 3,218
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2019, 9:31 am by Kent Scheidegger
Here, for example, the Republican-controlled legislature drew the challenged map, but the state's Democratic attorney general decided not to appeal the district court's decision striking it down. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:15 am by ASAD KHAN
Supreme Court allows tortured Tamil asylum-seeker’s appeal KV (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] UKSC 10 (6 March 2019) In a recent judgment given by Lord Wilson the Supreme Court unanimously allowed KV’s appeal, remitting the matter to the UT for fresh determination. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 5:32 pm by INFORRM
Interestingly, McFarlane P’s judgment drew attention to the use of social media as a relevant factor in evaluating the risk of future harm (at [64]). [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
  The Drum drew also discussed this recommendation. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 6:16 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, the employer’s petition for review was denied and the Board’s cross-application for enforcement was granted (Novato Healthcare Center v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:35 pm by Caroline Lee
Today the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Cal Fire Local 2881 v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
At Letters Blogatory, Ted Folkman discusses last week’s opinion in Jam v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:35 am by Matthew D. Donovan
A recent post-trial decision out of Delaware’s Court of Chancery, Personal Touch Holding Corp. v Glaubach, brings home this lesson with similar colloquial color. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:07 pm by Amy Howe
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971)Town of Greece v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 11:41 am by Daniel Hemel
The court on Wednesday obliterated it — and left the state to clean up the mess. * * * Past case linked to in this post: McCulloch v. [read post]