Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 861 - 880
of 6,446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm
In the second post, the present position will be compared with the current state of the law in Germany, with some references to the law in the United States of America. [read post]
12 May 2016, 2:00 am
He stated that the question to be answered was whether CPA Order 17, which was no doubt procedurally binding in Iraq, operated as an impediment rendering it impossible for the plaintiff to claim his right, under art 435, where the English courts were concerned. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: R. v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Article 20 provides that the requested State shall represent the requesting State in an proceedings in the requested State arising out of a request for extradition. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:25 am
I covered the oral argument for this blog in Plain English, with other coverage coming from David Savage of the Los Angeles Times. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:38 am
For this reason, Mr Anson had paid federal and state tax in the US on his share of HV’s profits. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:20 am
The 2004 Directive was implemented into English law by the Immigration EEA Regulations 2006 (“EEA Regulations“). [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:00 pm
Additionally, the communications between the parties and reward offer were in English. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:00 pm
Additionally, the communications between the parties and reward offer were in English. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 9:23 am
Morales-Vázquez, No. 19-1503, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (January 19, 2021), Judge Bruce M. [read post]
24 May 2024, 2:12 pm
Either new strategies will have to be developed; otherwise it may be harder for States to resist the temptation of human shield strategies may be irresistible. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:00 am
Aultman (1898) and United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
Coverage continues of the Court’s decisions in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Article 4(2) expressly excludes from the reach of the political offense exception several categories of offenses, including the following: (i) a murder or willful crime against the person of a Head of State of one of the Contracting States, or a member of the Head of State’s family; (ii) an offense for which both Contracting States have the obligation pursuant to a multilateral international agreement to extradite the person sought or to submit the case to… [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 12:23 pm
These folks would like CA to distinguish itself from the reasoning of Garcia v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
" Biden v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
The State applied to or Courts of that State shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character or not. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 9:17 am
Times, a recent California study shows improvement of public schools in the state since settlement of the lawsuit Williams v. [read post]
