Search for: "Edwards v. California" Results 861 - 880 of 1,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Wednesday, June 5, 2019 11:30 AM Conference Registration Opens 12:45—1:00 PM Conference Welcoming Remarks Larry Singer, Loyola University Chicago School of Law Edward Hutchinson, ASLME 1:00—3:00 PM Jay Healey Teaching Plenary Session, Ceremonial Courtroom, 10th Floor Moderators: Larry Singer, Loyola University Chicago School of Law Charity Scott, Georgia State College of Law Sidney Watson, Saint Louis University School of Law 3:15—4:30 PM Concurrent Sessions 1 A. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
John Deere, 383 US 1, 8-9 (1966).Edward C. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:05 pm by Katherine Rohde
HCBS programs are especially vital in light of the Supreme Court’s Olmstead v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
Edwards Lifesciences(EPLAW) (IPKat) EWCA dismisses appeal against decision of Patents Court finding non-infringement: Occlutech GmbH v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 9:10 pm
  The Supreme Court first recognized diversity in higher education as a "compelling" state interest in the 1978 ruling Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
There have been a couple of interesting cases involving social media: a HR manager bringing a constructive dismissal case against his former employer after a dispute over his LinkedIn profile; and the ongoing PhoneDog case in California raising the question of who owns a former employee’s Twitter account. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
Edwards Lifesciences(EPLAW) (IPKat) EWCA dismisses appeal against decision of Patents Court finding non-infringement: Occlutech GmbH v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Conservative MP and former Solicitor-General, Sir Edward Garnier, has sought to remove Amendment 2. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 5:22 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f)—the same provision that the government cited to support the travel ban upheld by the Supreme Court term in Trump v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(Spicy IP) Global credit crisis leads to boom times for legal process outsourcing businesses specialising in IP (Spicy IP)   Israel Israeli bakery Matzot Aviv files trade mark infringement suit against rival Patisserie Aviv and US importer Bagel Bites (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office relaxes conditions for modified examination (The IP Factor)   Italy Italian Supreme Court recognises ‘post sale confusion’ in criminal proceedings concerning sales of… [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360)   Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango)   Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]