Search for: "Ex Parte Story v. Story"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,023
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2008, 3:06 pm
Without a doubt, the most interesting oral argument so far, from a humor perspective anyway, was the one in FCC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:23 am
After the election of Coke as governor, the court heard the case of Ex parte Rodriguez, 39 Tex. 705 (1874). [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
It seems wise to precis the story so far before launching into my own view…I have attempted to be brutal in condensing the gist of various waypoints, because I want this to be a document which is both useful for lawyers and accessible to a wider audience than law-geeks. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
The story of Floyd and his cabinet co-conspirators was the paradigm case that shaped Section 3. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 6:37 pm
Nazi art looting was not a series of isolated incidents, but it was an essential part of a broader imperial regime. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
As former Justice Benjamin Curtis, who dissented in Dred Scott v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
In Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:20 am
What happened The case, Blackhorse v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:43 am
See id. at 649 (quoting Chief Justice Marshall in Ex parte Burr, 22 U.S. 529, 530 (1824)). [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 4:12 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:43 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:10 am
Besen v Farhadian, decided last week by the Manhattan-based Appellate Division, First Department, involved a dispute among equal one-third members of an LLC that owns a six-story multi-family apartment building. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 5:34 am
State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 4:09 am
Schwartz v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
A House of Lords Committee has heavily criticised the data sharing provisions in Part V of the Digital Economy Bill; it has reported that the provisions should not be supported in their current form. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
A case that has not just clarified, but in effect re-written, the rules on a fundamental principle of contractual law is the seminal case of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi and ParkingEye Limited v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67 (Case Comment here). [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 12:13 pm
Lewis bought his ex-wife’s interest in the Ponte Vedra Beach property as part of their divorce. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Supreme Court, June 18, 2008 Munaf v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 6:43 am
Burgett filed a request for reconsideration, which was considered after an ex parte appeal was filed to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and the Board remanded the case back to the PTO for consideration of the request for reconsideration. [read post]
