Search for: "Ex Parte United States"
Results 861 - 880
of 5,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2021, 12:07 pm
The qui tam case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:12 am
See entire order below.Ex Parte Federal National Mortgage Association, Petitioner.In Re Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) Loans Subject to Foreclosure Sale.ORDERPetitioner asks this Court to issue an ex parte temporary injunction1 or restraining order “enjoining all judicial officials in South Carolina conducting foreclosure sales on May 4, 2009 (or the next judicial sales dated) from dismissing all eligible one- to four-unit… [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether, when a post-indictment, ex parte restraining order freezes assets needed by a criminal defendant to retain counsel of choice, the Fifth and Sixth Amendments require a pre-trial, adversarial hearing at which the defendant may challenge the evidentiary support and legal theory of the underlying charges (here) and Schuette v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 8:10 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 8:22 am
(section 930 of title 18 of the United States Code). [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 4:39 pm
Our stockbroker fraud lawyers have helped thousands of people across the United States get their money back. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:57 pm
Alex Cochrane is a Senior Associate in the Cyber Investigation Unit at Collyer Bristow. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 5:32 am
LPL then bought Invest Financial and three other broker-dealers that were part of the National Planning Holdings network, FINRA states. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 5:32 am
LPL then bought Invest Financial and three other broker-dealers that were part of the National Planning Holdings network, FINRA states. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
It provides in relevant part: "The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by . . . citizens or subjects of any foreign state. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
Justice Department later unsealed the indictment, which alleges that Trump had stored in his boxes information regarding “defense and weapons capabilities of both the United States and foreign countries; United States nuclear programs; potential vulnerabilities of the United States and its allies to military attack; and plans for possible retaliation in response to a foreign attack. [read post]
22 May 2008, 2:48 pm
ACCA yesterday released a published opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 8:25 am
Attorney’s office has said that the United States intends to investigate and prosecute aggressively. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm
Following a vacate and remand order by the United States Supreme Court for employing the de novo standard of review rather than the abuse of discretion standard, the Ninth Circuit revisited the standard for relevance in the EEOC subpoena context. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am
If the events of January 6, 2021 were an insurrection against the United States and if Trump participated (important ifs), then as of that date Trump and every other participant in the alleged insurrection may no longer hold any state or federal office in the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:23 am
Nor is the evolution of international legal institutions an explanation: the fact that there is an international tribunal for ex-Yugoslavia but not for international terrorism is only because the United States helped push the United Nations to establish the former, but eschewed the establishment of the latter in favour of the so-called “war on terror”. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
In New York State, every state and local official takes an oath (set forth in Article XIII, Section 1 of the state constitution) to support the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 1:04 pm
The chief prosecutor in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 7:40 am
One possible exception occurred in 1789, when Hamilton obtained loans on his own authority to "meet expenses incurred at the beginning of the present government of the United States. [read post]
