Search for: "Fall v. State Bar" Results 861 - 880 of 4,388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2012, 9:19 am by Jon Sands
Alas, though, the 9th will give the State one more chance to follow its protocols, with modifications, as the Baze standards can be met, and other constitutional challenges fall short of what is required for the granting of a preliminary injunction.Moormann v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm by Jarod Bona
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm by Jarod Bona
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am by John Elwood
But this fall has been a time for beating the odds. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:50 am by Catherine Rose
    The post Case Comment: R (Nunn) v Chief Constable of Suffolk Constabulary [2014] UKSC 37 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 10:04 pm by Josh Blackman
Consider all the caveats in this passage: On the briefing and argument before us, it appears that these particular defendants fall within the scope of Ex parte Young's historic exception to state sovereign immunity. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:44 pm by Jeff Wurzburg (US)
” *Special thanks to Rachel Park, Law Clerk and District of Columbia Bar license pending, for her assistance in preparing this post. [1] Rose v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 7:15 pm by JP Zanders
In their review of the articles, state parties will have to acknowledge the invocation of Articles V and VI. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 9:27 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 The defense bar will continue to soldier on, as underpaid under-resourced champions of the constitution. [read post]