Search for: "Florida v. United States" Results 861 - 880 of 6,526
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Judge Corrigan of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted the plaintiff Properties of the Villages, Inc. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:06 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
  The United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, reviewed Fagan's civil complaint sua sponte (i.e. on its own, without any party filing a motion). [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:12 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and John V. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 10:55 am
  Remember insurance is a voluntary business and if David Rosmiller is correct that State Farm was surprised its recent Katrina verdict (Broussard v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:48 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Florida Growhouse Conviction Overturned Florida Grow House Defense Attorney Lawyer just recieved a report from a colleague about a ruling in a federal growhouse case, United States V. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:48 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Florida Growhouse Conviction Overturned Florida Grow House Defense Attorney Lawyer just recieved a report from a colleague about a ruling in a federal growhouse case, United States V. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:15 pm by Native American Rights Fund
(high interest, short term loans, Indian Commerce Clause)* United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2014dct.htmlKeepseagle v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:04 am by MSP Education Blog
In an interesting decision, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida dismissed a suit filed Humana Medical Plan – a Medicare Advantage plan saying that Humana could not meet the jurisdictional requirements. [read post]
  In September, the Florida Attorney General asked the Court to review the Eleventh Circuit’s ruling in NetChoice, L.L.C., v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 10:00 am by Mavrick Law Firm
The United States Supreme Court has concluded that “[w]hen an employee communicates to her employer a belief that the employer has engaged in . . . a form of employment discrimination, that communication virtually always constitutes the employee’s opposition to the activity. [read post]