Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 861 - 880
of 67,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2016, 11:26 am
"Given the nature of drug abuse, I'm confident that the number of times this will transpire will not fall anywhere near the "rare" category. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:46 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The mosque had aroused a great deal of public opposition; the county planning authorities nonetheless granted the necessary building permits; but a state court ruled that the county hadn’t given sufficient notice to the public about its meetings, given the heightened public interest in the mosque. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 2:55 pm
In this ILB entry from Sept. 25, and this ILB entry from Sept. 22, background was given on three 7th Circuit opinions in Indiana cases that were on the list of cases to be considered for cert at the conference of the SCOTUS on Monday, Sept. 24th:Gilles v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:38 pm
Seabrook v City of New York (2008 NY Slip Op 09471) [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 2:53 am
Given the current backlog, it is difficult to guess when we will get decisions][Further update: we won in State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 8:53 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 4:33 am
Regina v Barnett; [2011] EWCA Crim 2936; [2011] WLR (D) 385 “In relation to proceedings in which a defendant’s benefit from general criminal conduct was assessed the court was ‘entitled’ to make the assumptions provided for in section 10 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 even if the prosecution had not given the written preliminary notice provided for in section 71(2) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 1:20 am
Also President Reagan and President Bush I consulted the rankings.ABA v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 2:29 pm
In addition, there was not time to consider Teixeira v Lambeth and Ibrahim v Harrow properly, but it may be that further clarification was required in this area. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 2:29 pm
In addition, there was not time to consider Teixeira v Lambeth and Ibrahim v Harrow properly, but it may be that further clarification was required in this area. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:20 am
I suppose that is not surprising, given the Massachusetts v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 11:37 am
Judge Reinhardt concurs and explains why he's totally fine with that, especially given the nature of the facts. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:24 pm
” People v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 12:10 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONL-V v S. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
§ 16.1 Abuse or Breach of Confidential Relationship The Case: Givens v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:25 am
The post Self Representation v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 11:44 am
(See Nguyen v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:25 pm
In our prior nonpublished opinion, Tedesco v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:16 am
"The question, therefore, was the weight to be given to the agreement. [read post]
