Search for: "Greenhouse v. Greenhouse" Results 861 - 880 of 2,364
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2007, 9:31 am
Last term, when the Supreme Court decided Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm by Eric Biber
It is no accident that the EPA had been considering general permits as a tool for addressing the challenges of greenhouse gas regulation under the Clean Air Act, in particular using general permits to manage the great expansion of sources that would have been covered under the Title V permitting program of the Act. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:57 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
The International Adjudication of Environmental Disputes 30 Years Later Riccardo Luporini, Climate Change Litigation before International Human Rights Bodies: Insights from Daniel Billy et al. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 2:47 pm
Linda Greenhouse has this article in the New York Times on the Court's decision to review how the state of New York selects judicial candidates. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 7:31 am by Reva Siegel and Linda Greenhouse
Linda Greenhouse is Joseph Goldstein Lecturer at Yale Law School. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:44 pm
Greenhouse will discuss how Justice Powell might rule on today's immigration issues based on his opinion in Plyler v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:52 am by Erin Miller
In the New York Times, Linda Greenhouse reflects on what she sees as the "aggressive move" taken by the Court to hear new oral argument in the campaign finance case Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 2:58 am
Bush and Massachusetts v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
In the second case, Kaley v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 11:31 am by Steven Taber
 See, “Greenhouse Gases Should Be Considered in All EISs and EAs;” see also, Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 11:29 am by smtaber
  See, “Greenhouse Gases Should Be Considered in All EISs and EAs;” see also, Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:38 pm by WIMS
It read the provision to mean that ethanol plants fired with natural gas and/or biomass that commenced construction in 2008 or 2009 ('qualifying ethanol plants') are deemed compliant with the 20 percent greenhouse gas reduction requirement 'indefinitely.' . . [read post]