Search for: "Gregory v. State" Results 861 - 880 of 1,975
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Gregory Ablavsky maintains that the court’s decision this week in Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 10:10 am by Vanessa Sauter
Sarah Grant provided an update on the United States v. al-Nashiri proceedings. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 12:14 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticePanel Lacks Jurisdiction to Review Refusal to Block Death Penalty for Inadequate Notice to Defendant United States, appellee v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 3:20 am by Amy Howe
”  Six days after Friday’s announcement that the Court will review a challenge to a Texas law imposing additional regulations on abortion clinics in that state, coverage of and commentary on Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 11:07 pm
Co. v Goldfarb (53 NY2d at 401), the Court of Appeals reaffirmed the proposition that where an insurer may face liability based upon some of the grounds for recovery asserted but not upon others, the insured defendant is entitled to be represented by an attorney of his or her own choosing at the expense of the insurer (see Prashker v United States Guar. [read post]