Search for: "HOFFMAN V. STATE"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,042
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2009, 7:03 am
This appears to be consistent with the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries’ policy, as stated by its Director in May of 2002, following the Hoffman Plastics decision. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 2:00 am
(Ills, Pills And Attendant Thrills) India and UK: NICE, Nexavar, and why it matters (Ills, Pills And Attendant Thrills) (Spicy IP) Israel: State of Israel sues Omrix, which commercialises medical adhesives, for half a billion, claiming that their IP is based on service inventions belonging to the State (IP Factor) Kenyan anti-counterfeiting law to face constitutional challenge (Michael Geist) (Afro-IP) US: Monsanto announces new policy regarding Roundup Ready Seeds (Patent Docs)… [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 10:54 am
Yeager v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 6:29 am
[State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:18 am
Subsequent cases applied Panasia and Bi-Economy to other policies, including for example to disability insurance in Hoffman v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP) Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46) Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks v… [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm
United States, 380 U.S. 24 (1965) McKeiver v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:56 am
â€Â  McConnell v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 6:31 am
The full case can be found at United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:03 am
State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:51 am
Hoffman LaRoche, Inc., 917 A.2d 767 (N.J. 2007) (which we reviewed here), the court held that in personal injury actions, the individual plaintiff's home state/place where the injury occurred should control: [H]aving considered the contacts relevant to the competing interests of the states in light of Rowe, this Court concludes that the competing interests of the states, the most important factor, weighs in favor of applying the law of each plaintiff's… [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 1:14 pm
The court also cited a recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision -- Rowe v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 6:00 am
In Hoffman v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:33 am
Hoffman-La Roche Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 9:00 am
State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
The courts’ willingness to enforce the public policy purposes underlying HESCA is evident in Hoffman v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 11:12 am
(Citing Burns v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 10:30 am
A Naked Person Issued Notice of Violation, 841 F.Supp. 1153 (M.D.Fla. 1993) & Hoffman v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:54 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 12:10 am
In Ondrisek v. [read post]
