Search for: "HOGAN v. HOGAN" Results 861 - 880 of 983
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2009, 2:20 pm by Lyle Denniston
Commentary Eighteen months ago, the Supreme Court decided Boumediene v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:44 am by Andrew Frisch
On the one hand, some courts found that “employees who represent the employer with the public, negotiate on behalf of the company, and engage in sales promotion” were exempt from overtime requirements. 69 Fed.Reg.. 22,122, 22,145 (Apr. 23, 2004), citing Hogan v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 9:17 am
"The case of The Estate of Tammy Evans v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 1:35 am
Spisak's cases, the federal courts' decisions to overturn the death sentences hinged on Mills v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 2:18 am
Subscription required for online Access: [www.law.com] Merger-averse Hogan looks for global reach "Hogan & Hartson has traditionally been merger shy. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Well kids it's time to take a deep breath and breathe breathe breathe, in and out, visualize, close your eyes and inhale slowly as you imagine yourself as a cork on the ocean, drifting ever so slightly across a judicial sea, a calm and peaceful sea, where there are frolicking dolphins and rainbows and lollipops and Judge Schwartz and.....Hi, I see you're back.Well let's just jump right in and take a peek at this week's wonderful world of written utterances:BIV v. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 4:15 pm
Hogan, (2008), holding that an Egyptian Coptic Christian should have been given an opportunity to challenge Egypt's assurance that he would not be tortured if he was returned to Egypt where he had been convicted in abstentia of murder. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:46 am
By Krystalline Kraus Published on rabble.ca (http://www.rabble.ca), reproduced here on author’s request Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney have the political power to decide who they want to let into Canada and who they want to keep out. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 6:35 am
This is a new case reported in the excellent Legal Action Magazine, Saad v. [read post]