Search for: "Harris v. Falls" Results 861 - 880 of 987
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am by Andrew Koppelman
  Its best pages vividly describe the Virginia that Harry Byrd dominated, first as governor and then as U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:17 am
John DonohueIn my view, Justice Scalia blundered badly last week in his concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 7:20 am
Coordinators have assisted over 300 families this year, and have a presence with Title V, P & A, CHIP, the Child Find Policy and Practice Committee, the Governor's Chronic Illness Task Force and the Family Resource Connection (devoted to early childhood issues)! [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:33 am by admin
  These conditions were tested in the Texas judicial system with the case of Inwood North Homeowners’ Association Inc. v Charlie Harris, Jr., et al. and Rolando M. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 2:27 am by INFORRM
Technically a decision in the High Court on reporting restrictions falls for publication under the Transparency Guidance (Schedule1.6 of paragraph 17) which specifies that any application for an order involving a restraint on publication of information relating to the proceedings should normally be published (subject to a written judgment or order for a transcript). [read post]
22 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
According to this anti-trans perspective, calling oneself female as a trans may fall into the same general category as calling oneself black as a white person; it could be a type of “girlface,” parallel to blackface.Another reason that some feminists have offered for resisting assertions of trans female identity is that the identity may appear to suggest that particular traits necessarily belong to women, while others necessarily belong to men. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
And then it is on to the argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court decision in Mallory v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 9:11 pm
Presumably that's why the city saw fit to contract out the menial task to a private mom-and-pop operation, rather than using its own workers, not to mention officials.Tooke v. [read post]