Search for: "Heard v. United States" Results 861 - 880 of 7,743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2012, 11:53 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] heard its final oral arguments [day call, PDF] of the term Wednesday in Arizona v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 2:17 pm by David Wilson
The Supreme Court of the United States recently heard and decided a case from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:10 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website, JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [day call, PDF] Monday in DePierre v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday heard oral arguments [day call, PDF; merit briefs] in Bond v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:57 am by Jeff Welty
But until recently, I had never heard of a state criminal case being removed to federal court. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:21 am by Robert Black
A case involving the fatal shooting of a Mexican national by a United States Border Patrol Agent is back at the Supreme Court a second time as the Justices heard arguments this week in Hernandez v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:18 pm
Thinking about suing an agency of the United States? [read post]
A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Friday heard oral arguments in Maryland Shall Issue Inc. et. al. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 9:50 am
. - The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard a patent infringement lawsuit styled Momenta Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:30 am by Scott Bluni
The latest ruling involving patent eligibility of medical diagnostics comes from Chief Judge Connolly of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in a consolidated case brought by CareDx, Inc. and the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University against Natera, Inc. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:00 pm
The panel of judges who heard the case also issued additional views. [read post]