Search for: "High v State" Results 861 - 880 of 35,504
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2020, 2:20 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, UIC John Marshall Law School The Supreme Court ruled today in United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:04 am by tracey
High Court (Administrative Court) BN, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2367 (Admin) (16 September 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:46 am by traceydennis
High Court (Administrative Court) Smarden Parish Council v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Anor [2010] EWHC 701 (Admin) (30 March 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:48 pm by Michael Froomkin
Harold Wasserman has a nice Flag Day post, celebrating the 70th anniversary of West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Wyeth v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 10:25 pm by Rosalind English
The leading case on the state’s duty to investigate, Amin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC 653 makes it clear that the investigative obligation of the State may – depending on what facts are at issue – go well beyond the ascertainment of individual fault and reach questions of system, management and institutional culture. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 12:25 pm by Shams Hirji
The post Vaccine Cases Step Out of the Shadows at High Court appeared first on Sixth Circuit Appellate Blog. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 9:07 am
The IPKat has had his attention directed to the decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Teva UK Ltd, [2011] EWCA Civ 382, a ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Sir Andrew Morrit, The Chancellor of the High Court, providing a judgment with which Richards and Patten LJJ agreed) handed down yesterday.To summarise: Teva had applied for revocation of Merck’s European Patent (EP(UK) 0509752), relating to “ophthalmic compositions comprising combinations of… [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:11 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for the Home Department v SP (North Korea) & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 114 (16 February 2012) Sherdley & Anor v Nordea Life and Pension SA (Societe Anonyme) [2012] EWCA Civ 88 (16 February 2012) Simcoe v Jacuzzi UK Group Plc [2012] EWCA Civ 137 (16 February 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Cardao-Pito, R (on the application of) v Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher… [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 12:08 pm by James Beck
  That makes 37 state (and DC) high courts adopting the rule versus only Karl on the other side. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 12:08 pm by James Beck
  That makes 37 state (and DC) high courts adopting the rule versus only Karl on the other side. [read post]