Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 861 - 880
of 3,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2014, 6:37 pm
This effort, he told a dinner gathering of the Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights advocacy group, is intended “to give real meaning” to the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:51 am
United Business Machines, Inc., D2001-0577 (WIPO June 6, 2001); Government of Canada v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:05 am
Jackson filed her brief in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 7:00 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am
IRAP v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 7:48 pm
Dudas, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office (07-1504), the U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:47 am
"Huawei's counsel didn't have an immediate answer, but promised to check.In the United States, the court would have requested the views of the Solicitor General of the United States ("CVSG"). [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 7:12 am
United States, Black v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 11:19 pm
Late on Monday, a group of amici curiae ("friends of the court") asked the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for permission to file an amicus brief in support of Samsung, opposing Apple's pursuit of injunctive relief following a multiplicity of infringement findings by a district court. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
§ 602(a)(1).That section provides that importing goods into the United States without the authority of the copyright holder is illegal. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
§ 602(a)(1).That section provides that importing goods into the United States without the authority of the copyright holder is illegal. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
§ 602(a)(1).That section provides that importing goods into the United States without the authority of the copyright holder is illegal. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
§ 602(a)(1).That section provides that importing goods into the United States without the authority of the copyright holder is illegal. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm
Miniard 23-444Issue: Whether, when counsel is physically present, state action is required before a court may find a complete denial of counsel under United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 10:13 am
’ United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:01 am
Cir. 2007), the Federal Circuit held that US patent rights are only exhausted through a first sale “in the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:37 am
Wouldn't there be a U.S. interest in deterring such fraud, reducing private enforcement costs within the United States? [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 5:38 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit announced in Broadcom Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 12:03 pm
In Ruiz v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 10:21 am
In Abitron Austria GmbH v. [read post]
