Search for: "Holmes v. State" Results 861 - 880 of 1,341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2010, 9:18 am by Adam Wagner
The Mayor of London v Hall & Ors [2010] EWHC 1613 (QB) (29 June 2010) - Read judgment The Mayor of London has won a court order to evict a camp of protesters from Parliamentary Square, with the High Court stating that his response to the protest was proportionate and not a breach of the protesters’ human rights. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 1:31 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Judge Closes Courtroom to Observers Midtrial—Murder Conviction Reversed In People of Michigan v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:21 am by Big Tent Democrat
As Justice Holmes stated, the notion of liberty encompassed in the Constitution does not include Herbert Spencer's Social Statics. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
  Travelling around in cyberspace, and covering as much ground as Kingsley, is Katfriend Miri Frankel who, having only just penned a guest post for PatLit on the SHIELD anti-troll draft bill in the United States, popped up in quite a different area of IP with "Sherlock Holmes and the Case of the Copyright Expiration Date", here. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 9:16 am by Unknown
Holmes, stating that plaintiffs can only claim prejudgment interest under Colorado's Statutory Interest statute, in cases where they have already spent money on repairs, not when they are suing for an estimate of what repairs will cost in the future. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 8:37 am by Andrew Hamm
During his stint at the Department of Justice, Sanford also participated in the only criminal trial ever held by the Supreme Court: United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Etc.And yet, tests may be less important than meets the eye, for at least three reasons.First, as Holmes famously stated in his Lochner dissent, "general propositions do not decide concrete cases. [read post]
22 May 2018, 10:33 am by Sandy Levinson
 The so-called Bill of Rights had no effective legal presence prior to the 1940s, and Justice Holmes, I believe in Buck v. [read post]