Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court" Results 861 - 880 of 974
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 am
In 2000, the House of Lords effectively approved these conditions, in the landmark case on the point - Inco Europe v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 9:16 pm
We can't figure out this Kafkaesque decision from the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
The Court of Appeal’s judgment in Heald and others v LB Brent [2009] EWCA Civ 930 is just out concerning the outsourcing of s 202 Housing Act 1996 reviews by Brent to Minos Perdios’ company Housing Reviews Ltd. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 12:53 pm
Specifically, the court affirmed a superior court decision that precluded the City of Los Angeles from enforcing an affordable housing ordinance against a mixed-use project that is being developed by Palmer. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 6:53 am
Greenberg v Mallick Management, Inc., 527 N.E. 2d 943, 949 (Ill. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 11:47 am
" A warrantless search of a suspect's house without exigent circumstances is presumptively unreasonable, Payton v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 12:31 pm by Patti Spencer
An example of its enforcement is the 1994 Pennsylvania Superior Court case, Savoy v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 1:08 am
Los Angeles Superior Court Survives Its First Furlough The National Law Journal Los Angeles County Superior Court survived the first of 12 days of self-imposed job furloughs Wednesday. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 9:57 am
” “FDR did not hesitate long over a 1937 Supreme Court opinion (United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:14 pm
(We all assume, as we must given the procedural posture of the case, that he's right; that state law didn't limit the plaintiff to only 12 plants.)Defendants then seek summary judgment on a stupid ground, which both the trial court and the Court of Appeal properly reject. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 3:49 am
The more than $500,000 settlement stems from a lawsuit filed three years ago by Alfred Rava in Alameda County Superior Court. [read post]
29 May 2009, 3:23 am
"The New Jersey Superior Court - Appellate Division recently analyzed the applicability of the inevitable discovery principle in State v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 12:51 am
A report by the receiver in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 2:53 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 689, contending that it owed no duty of care to the plaintiff. [read post]