Search for: "Hughes v. State"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,956
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, and Lord Toulson. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:31 am
Justice Hughes concurred in the result only, while Justice Wright filed a separate dissenting opinion (Kentucky Restaurant Association v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
Ingenious Media and Patrick McKenna were represented by Hugh Tomlinson QC and Jessica Simor QC (both of Matrix Chambers), instructed by Olswang LLP. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am
Ingenious Media and Patrick McKenna were represented by Hugh Tomlinson QC and Jessica Simor QC (both of Matrix Chambers), instructed by Olswang LLP. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
In Warger v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 1:50 am
R (Johnson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
In State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 5:17 pm
Apple v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 7:24 am
As we discussed on Tuesday, following the Fanny Hill case (Memoirs v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 7:44 am
Albanese Popkin Hughes Cove, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Colb, a Justia columnist, is Professor of Law and Charles Evans Hughes Scholar at Cornell Law School. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
The case is styled, Vinings Insurance Company v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 11:45 am
See Hughes v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:23 am
See Hughes v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
In the case of State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 7:27 am
Lords Hughes and Toulson disagreed with the majority on this issue. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm
Boundary crossing: sharing research w/community at large v. within the pharma co. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am
Predictable v. unpredictable. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:45 pm
McGannon Award for work to advance the roles of women and people of color in the media reform movement, and won the 2015 Hugh Hefner 1st Amendment Award for framing net neutrality as a civil rights issue. [read post]
