Search for: "IN RE CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF STATE LAW" Results 861 - 880 of 2,618
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2011, 12:38 pm by Stephen Jenei
This last section (b) leaves a lot of questions. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The other class action complaints: Forest moved to dismiss the Missouri state law claim brought by non-Missouri plaintiffs on choice of law grounds. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:49 am by Edward T. Kang
Thus, the court held that “as long as the named plaintiffs have standing to sue the named defendants, any concern about whether it is proper to include out-of-state, nonparty class members with claims subject to different state laws is a question of predominance under Rule 23(b)(3), not a question of ‘adjudicatory competence’ under Article III. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:26 am by SHG
As a rule, SCOTUS decides questions of federal law, not state law. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:32 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
On June 14, 2019, some 51 cities and counties filed a motion for certification of a Rule 23(b)(3) negotiation class, drawing objections from State Attorneys General pursuing their own state court claims, and an order from the Court allowing Plaintiffs to re-brief their motion in light of the objections. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:42 pm by Gregory Dell
They’re going to come across this really important question about permanency. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:13 pm by DBL Law
City/State: Louisville, Kentucky Position Title: Defense Litigation Paralegal/Paralegal Manager Major Duties: As a litigation paralegal, I assist one partner and several associates in representing numerous clients in healthcare law disputes. [read post]
1 May 2024, 2:26 pm by DBL Law
City/State: Louisville, Kentucky Position Title: Defense Litigation Paralegal/Paralegal Manager Major Duties: As a litigation paralegal, I assist one partner and several associates in representing numerous clients in healthcare law disputes. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 6:31 am
Sounds like medical monitoring, pure and simple.The court finds nine common issues sufficient to justify class treatment, and it makes the same error seen in the United States so often: It accepts common questions that are utterly generic and so would exist in any case. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 8:03 am
  AI is projected into the great societal debates in liberal democratic states (diversity, equality, gender, and rule of law, etc.) and then offered up as a threat (a device for augmentation of societal wrongs) unless appropriately domesticated. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:30 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 The District Court determined that a controlling question of law was involved, and an immediate appeal would materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 2:23 pm by Lovechilde
  The references to "Barack Hussein Obama" and relentless questions about Obama's birth certificate -- pioneered by one Donald J. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 6:57 am by Gregory Weber
The regulation then further confirms that the other commonly known required recertification that could effect the ability to bid as a small business (or a certain status) is when the solicitation for an order or agreement (such as a BPA) explicitly asks for such re-certification. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 11:18 am by David Markus
Buck’s petition for certiorari asked: “did the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit impose an improper and unduly burdensome Certificate of Appealability (COA) standard? [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 11:11 pm by thelawprofessor
If you’re an Asian woman, your culture might lead you not to ask specific questions as doing so might be considered “rude” in your country. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am by John Jascob
In the 2014 case of Halliburton II, the Supreme Court re-affirmed the Basic v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:02 am by Andrew Dickinson
Questions of a different kind would, of course, arise if the class action judgment had been delivered, not by a U.S. court, but by a court of a State within the Brussels/Lugano Regime. [read post]