Search for: "IN RE GRANT"
Results 861 - 880
of 37,585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2008, 3:04 pm
In Re: Aredia and Zometa Products Liability Litigation, No. 06-md-01760 (M.D. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm
’s decision in In re Link_A_Media Devices Corp. and concluding that the “balance of convenience” factors nonetheless tipped in defendants’ favor. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 12:00 am
In In re Dynavax Sec. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:24 am
Occupation:10.Age: [Now we're getting somewhere! [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:34 am
(I just love this - each paragraph uses the right noun depending on whether we're talking about privilege or protection). [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 4:41 am
Reserving the question as to whether the trial judge erred in granting the State's motion, the Court concluded that this issue of law is, at best, "unsettled," meaning that the relator did not show a "clear right to the relief sought. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 2:48 pm
" I won't go into the details of the discovery violation, or how it came out at trial, or the sanctions hearing at trial.- they're all spelled out in detail in Judge Davis' order. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
In re Payam MAHMOODZADEH.No. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:16 am
” In re Motor Fuel, at *1. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:19 am
” In re Land Rover, at 2. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 12:36 pm
” In re Indianapolis Life, at 2. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 9:07 am
He has graciously agreed to share that post at Patently-O and I thought I would re-post here for our readers as well.] [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 6:03 pm
There are two options available in this situation: requesting re-examination by the Patent Office; and/or commencing revocation proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
In this instance, the court may grant res ipsa. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
In this instance, the court may grant res ipsa. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
In this instance, the court may grant res ipsa. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 8:15 am
On October 28, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) granted a petition for a writ of mandamus directing the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in In re: Nitro Fluids, L.L.C. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline project? [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline project? [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline project? [read post]
