Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF J. A. C."
Results 861 - 880
of 5,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2017, 1:33 pm
C. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:22 am
Case Name: ROBERT C. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
In determining “whether any advertising concerning a food or food product is false or misleading,” courts must also consider factors including—but not limited to—the following: “(a) subject matter; (b) visual content; (c) use of animated characters or child-oriented activities and incentives; (d) music or other audio content; (e) age of models; (f) presence of child celebrities or celebrities who appeal to children; (g) language; (h) competent and… [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am
Malone, J.), dated February 6, 2023. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 8:18 am
"Article 8(3) injunctions as a regulatory orderThis said, and having thus crossed the "legal Rubicon of vesting the High Court with a jurisdiction to grant an injunction against a non-infringing ISP" [para 63], "then what follows is really all merely a matter of degree. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 9:30 am
[To be continued in Installment 8] (With appreciation to Michael J. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Eugenia Koutelis Condon, County Attorney, Albany (Yorden C. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Eugenia Koutelis Condon, County Attorney, Albany (Yorden C. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:02 am
On Thursday 18 June 2020, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in In the matter of XY (Scotland). [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 7:59 am
First up is Steven J. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 11:15 am
Sept. 25, 2012 Stevens, P.J., Lazarus, J. and Colville, J.) [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:40 pm
April 11, 2011, Munley, J.). [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 10:46 am
However, the Court of Appeal agreed with Mann J's construction. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 12:13 pm
Matthew J. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Martoche, J.), entered April 14, 2023, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Martoche, J.), entered April 14, 2023, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 10:42 am
Richard J. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 4:39 am
The author, Robert J. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
The Administrative Law Judge found, upon the hearing, that a preponderance of the evidence showed that the petitioner committed a category three act of neglect (see Social Services Law §§493[3][a][i]; [4][c]; 494[1][a]; 14 NYCRR 624.5[j][1][i]; 700.4-700.5). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 4:41 am
C. [read post]