Search for: "In Re Lange" Results 861 - 880 of 1,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2015, 4:06 am by Terry Hart
” Writing for the Seventh Circuit, Judge Easterbrook said, We’re skeptical of Cariou‘s approach, because asking exclusively whether something is “transformative” not only replaces the list in §107 but also could override 17 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:40 am by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Google speichert jedoch Ihre Unterhaltungen mit Ihrem Konto bis zu 72 Stunden lang, auch wenn die Bard-Aktivitäten deaktiviert sind. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
In short, there’s nothing surprising here: we’re in line with European Union law. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Matthew Hickey
For round two of our Battle Of The Cloud-Based Practice Management Software series, we’re digging into the functionality of Rocket Matter. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 3:48 pm by Patrick Dwyer
This article was written by Patrick Dwyer, Langes National Consumer Credit Reform Project Co-ordinator. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 11:27 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
” You’re the editor of two Wolters Kluwer publications: ‘International Licensing and Technology Transfer: Practice and the Law’ and ‘Intellectual Property and Competition Law’. [read post]
  The judge notes that “these are familiar concepts” but by way of re-familiarisation: in this case the comparables case involved looking at the SEP licences which the patentee (InterDigital) had previously agreed with other implementers, whilst the top-down approach is an alternative method of cross-checking the rate derived by the comparable licence approach. [read post]
 In the judgment, the Court re-emphasises its readiness to set the terms of a global FRAND licence and finds that as between Optis and Apple an annual lump sum of US$5.13m is FRAND for the portion of Optis’ portfolio(s) to which Apple requires a licence (just over 60%).[2] At 283 pages long, the judgment is not a quick read and therefore this article only scratches the surface of its contents. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:39 am by Ron Coleman
Rather, we’re talking about dilution by blurring here. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:18 am by Nicholas Round (Bristows)
  The judge notes that “these are familiar concepts” but by way of re-familiarisation: in this case the comparables case involved looking at the SEP licences which the patentee (InterDigital) had previously agreed with other implementers, whilst the top-down approach is an alternative method of cross-checking the rate derived by the comparable licence approach. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 1:36 am
Alan Lange over at Y'all Politics has started a feature called Where Is Jim Hood? [read post]
This was a summary proceedings started by Philips, owner of standard essential patents EP 89201206 and EP 89200094, covering technology for writing and overwriting on CD-Rs (Compact Disc Recordable, i.e. discs that can be written only once) and CD-RWs (Compact Disc Re-writable, i.e. discs that can be written multiple times). [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
 The reasons are thorough and detailed, serving as a valuable application of the ‘political discussion’ brand of qualified privilege recognised in Lange v Atkinson (No 2). [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:02 am by Elizabeth McAuliffe (Bristows)
  It is not enough that some persons actually engage in the art at the material time laboured under a particular prejudice if a substantial number of others did not (Re Glaxo Group Ltd’s Patent [2004] RPC 43). [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 8:24 am by Lovechilde
”  No less frequently, its spokespeople create rules and measures for its enemies in an effort to prove they’re not succeeding. [read post]