Search for: "In re COX"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,124
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2009, 5:22 am
” In re Cox Enterprises, Inc., Set-Top Cable Television Box Antitrust Litig., ___ F.Supp.2d ___ (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 9:22 pm
§ 1407, Unopposed by Class Action Plaintiffs, but Transfers Actions to Western District of Oklahoma Four class actions – two in Louisiana and one in Arizona and Georgia – were filed against various defendants, including Cox Enterprises, Cox Communications, Cox Communications Louisiana, Cox Communications New Orleans, and CoxCom (collectively “the Cox defendants”), together with an additional 14 potentially-related class action… [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 3:42 pm
Day seven of the CRTC's network management hearing featured just one company: Bell. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:25 pm
Re: United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 9:54 pm
Above, left: this charming little fellow is just nuts about Creative Commons, which has licensed his transmission on this blogBut from now his task gets easier, since --thanks to his good friend Hugo Cox -- he has discovered a handy Google Image Search device that helps him root out images with Creative Commons or other tagged licence terms, as well as works in the public domain. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 7:04 am
In court they're going to be treated as publishers. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 7:10 am
If you're looking for any ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Communities or the Court of First Instance since 17 June 1997, you can search for it on the Curia website in various ways. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:59 am
We're looking to improve on our own system. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 7:47 am
The IPKat's friend and 1709 Blog colleague Hugo Cox is currently looking for a fresh challenge. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 12:00 pm
Western District of Oklahoma MDL No. 2048, In re Cox Enterprises, Inc., Set-Top Cable Television Box Antitrust Litig. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:07 am
He sent an email to Pendergest-Holt and others three days later re-emphasising that point. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 5:00 pm
He sent an email to Pendergest-Holt and others three days later re-emphasising that point. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 3:24 pm
Until you need us, Patrick Cox TaxMasters [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 6:42 pm
"Lisa suggested that as with domain names, the law of trade marks should be relevant to protect brands, and needs re examining to see if it could meet this kind of challenge. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
It is a legacy of the Cox Commission. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 8:00 am
We are discussing In re Intech Investment Management, a recent administrative proceeding brought by the Commission against an adviser with pro-shareholder voting practices. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 7:38 am
Until you need us, Patrick Cox Tax Masters [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
In fact, this was not the case, as In re Intech Investment Management demonstrated. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 8:00 am
Although finished under Schapiro, the case was almost certainly initiatied under Cox. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 3:03 am
This eventually led to Cuban responding to this rogue Staffer via email, copying then-SEC Chair Chris Cox. [read post]
