Search for: "In the interest of C.D."
Results 861 - 880
of 926
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2021, 4:01 am
One Sunday each month we bring you a summary from Supreme Advocacy LLP of recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
., 249 F.R.D. 580 (C.D. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm
CV 11-4272 GAF SPX, 2012 WL 1356495, at *1 (C.D. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am
The case is interesting because it provides a perfect model for a judicially efficient means of resolving serial ADA cases. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
Toyota Motor (07/16/10) (C.D. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
LEXIS 194740 (C.D. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
That an injunction is in the public interest 3. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
LEXIS 194740 (C.D. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
City of Los Angeles, 2019 WL 3213581 (C.D. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
The ICO was an “interested party” to the case and previously said the guidance issued by the government regarding the exemption lacked clarity. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:26 pm
Notably, Missouri has adopted Section 187 of the Restatement (Second) of Conflicts, which provides in pertinent part as follows:[t]he law of the state chosen by the parties to govern their contractual rights and duties will be applied, unless either(a) the chosen state has no substantial relationship to the parties or the transaction and there is no other reasonable basis for the parties' choice, or(b) application of the law of the chosen state would be contrary to a fundamental policy of a… [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 7:21 pm
He’s received many awards, including IAFP’s Ewen C.D. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
In this episode of Entertainment Law Update, Entertainment lawyers Gordon Firemark and Tamera Bennet review the latest cases and controversies in the entertainment industry. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:55 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:55 am
This observation raises interesting questions regarding the basis on which juries are expected to make decisions in complex cases. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm
But of course other information in the case can lead interested researchers to the party's identity. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 12:23 pm
LEXIS 6483 (C.D. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 8:33 am
In case you folks are interested, here is our argument: Summary of Argument In Tinker v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 12:50 am
Interested parties will have 60 days from publication in the Federal Register to submit comments and respond to the FTC’s questions and requests for evidence. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:04 am
Also, in my opinion, four possible academics could be considered seriously after an intervening judicial appointment (though, as discussed, some are implausible given that the Administration has not shown much interest in making sig [read post]
