Search for: "JOHN DOES, I-III" Results 861 - 880 of 1,758
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2015, 8:03 pm by Ray Dowd
SCOTUS Blog Co-Founder Tom Goldstein's presentation will surely be a highlight.I am bolding and highlighting the panel that I will be on so that it does not get lost in the shuffle of luminaries and dignitaries (and because we have to compete with the Supreme Court!) [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relisted cases. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 7:41 am by Dennis Crouch
 These include Cuozzo & Pulse that I have previously discussed. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 4:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In addition, at the roughly same time, Vice Chancellor John Noble withheld his approval of a shareholder settlement in a merger objection lawsuit arising from Roche’s $8.3 million acquisition of InterMune. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:49 am by Andrew Trask
While the various Jane and John Does suing Ashley Madison each pay lip service to the practical, tactical considerations are apparent. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 10:06 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky and Mark J. Levin
John’s survey findings in a more meaningful context. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:42 pm
The court briefly discussed plaintiff’s claims for declaratory relief and aiding and abetting for Count III and Count IV, before granting defendant’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Adebayo Lanlokun, Olswang LLP
The Finance Act 1991 amended ICTA 1988 by introducing three methods that allowed cessation of approval of a scheme: (i) approval ceased automatically 36 months after the introduction of regulations if the scheme still failed to comply with them (s 591A); (ii) where the Revenue considers that the facts cease to warrant the continuance of approval, the Revenue may also withdraw approval by notice from a date specified in the notice, which must not be earlier than the date when the facts first… [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 6:50 am
Chief Justice John Roberts is also quite the standing hawk, and I suspect he’d vote the same way. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:07 am
When a court considers a motion to dismiss for lack of Article III standing, the court must assume that the facts are as the plaintiffs allege. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Among other things, the statute does not address other types of litigation reform bylaws, including, for example, bylaws requiring arbitration of shareholder suits and minimum stake to sue bylaws. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
Second, the exercise of judgment in finding the single best meaning does in fact often involve significant discretion. [read post]