Search for: "Jacob C" Results 861 - 880 of 1,167
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In its interlocutory decision T 1068/07 of 25 June 2010, Board 3.3.08 referred the following question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA): Does a disclaimer infringe A 123(2) if its subject-matter was disclosed as an embodiment of the invention in the application as filed? [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 10:49 pm by uwlegalscholarship
Levine, Professor of Law, and Director of the Jewish Law Institute, Touro College Jacob D. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 1:43 am
This is consistent with the current EPO approach to routinely allowing post-filing data showing a technical effect, in support of support inventive step: EPO Guidelines for Examination Chapter C-VI 5.3.5 Evidence Under certain circumstances, however, later filed examples or new effects, even if not allowed into the application, may nevertheless be taken into account by the examiner as evidence in support of the patentability of the claimed invention. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:33 pm by Jon Sham
Justice delayed at Maryland Court of Appeals – by Steve Lash Kevin C. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:15 am by Staci Zaretsky
Team Jacob debate that emerged from the Twilight saga. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:45 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
Jacob of Kfar Hanan said: “Of him who is in Our image and likeness [I say] ‘uredu’ (have dominion); but of him who is not in our image and likeness [I say] ‘yerdu’ (let them descend). [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
.: Arte Publico Press, c2010 HV8699.U5 A7713 2010 See Catalog Capitalism -- United States WINNER-TAKE-ALL POLITICS: HOW WASHINGTON MADE THE RICH RICHER, AND TURNED ITS BACK ON THE MIDDLE CLASS / JACOB S. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
.: Arte Publico Press, c2010 HV8699.U5 A7713 2010 See Catalog Capitalism -- United States WINNER-TAKE-ALL POLITICS: HOW WASHINGTON MADE THE RICH RICHER, AND TURNED ITS BACK ON THE MIDDLE CLASS / JACOB S. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
”InsufficiencyMoving on to the question of insufficiency, the Judge explained that[458] “A patent is invalid “if the specification does not disclose the invention clearly enough and completely enough for it to be performed by a person skilled in the art” (section 72(1)(c) of the 1977 Act). [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:16 am
Reason.com: Rick Scott Scales Back His Urine Demands by Jacob Sullum, June 23, 2011: In response to a Fourth Amendment lawsuit, Florida Gov. [read post]