Search for: "James v. State"
Results 861 - 880
of 9,744
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Fulmer v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 9:11 am
Court of Appeals in a case entitled ACLU v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:06 am
Jeffrey James D.C. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 6:54 am
Sleepy’s, LLC, 220 N.J. 289 (2015), a New Jersey appellate panel held, in Garden State Fireworks, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 5:39 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: AC32807 - State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 8:20 am
In State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
United States, and Davis v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:14 pm
” Raymond James Fin. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
Worcester of Loudoun County, Virginia, whose decisions to reopen the cases of five immigrants directly contradict a recent ruling by the state's high court.Last month, the Virginia Supreme Court unanimously held in Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 9:46 am
Booth Computers and James Cohen, BER-C-135-08, Chan. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 9:57 am
” (United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:29 pm
The oral argument transcript in Maples v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 11:34 pm
Mansfield v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
In Kahler v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:30 pm
The EPA and Department of the Army announced a final rule amending the definition of protected “waters of the United States” in light of the decision in Sackett v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 10:05 am
The University of Iowa College of Law invites submissions for a proposed symposium to mark the 25th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in Batson v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
" How could Ashley have made this statement four years after the United States Supreme Court declared a constitutional right to own slaves in the infamous decision of Dred Scott v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 4:27 pm
by James Kachmar On May 7, 2009, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in the case, Barnes v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 10:52 am
Central Indiana Podiatry, P.C. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
A Fifth Circuit panel consisting of Judges Priscilla Richman, James Ho, and Kurt Engelhardt affirmed Hanen’s ruling. [read post]