Search for: "Jordan v. Jordan" Results 861 - 880 of 2,586
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2009, 10:35 pm
He claimed that they were taken because he was a Mormon after a Texas raid on and FLDS complex that led to removal of children.In Jordan v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:31 am
Jordan ("On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) he is entitled to a new trial on the kidnapping counts because the trial court’s instruction did not comport with the requirement of State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 2:26 pm
The AP has this article on Azimi v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 5:00 am by James Romoser
Mass.: Explained (Jordan Rubin, Bloomberg Law) The post The morning read for Tuesday, Sept. 14 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 7:36 am by James Romoser
Wade (Mary Ziegler, The Atlantic) John Roberts has lost control of the Supreme Court (Joan Biskupic, CNN) ‘Shadow Docket’ Use in Top Court Abortion Ruling Fuels Angst (Kimberly Robinson & Jordan Rubin, Bloomberg News) Supreme Court vote on Texas abortion law allows a ban without mentioning Roe v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 2:13 pm
Mike Graczyk of Associated Press offers a preview of Smith v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:55 am by Douglas Reiser
Attorney Jordan Foster, of Tacoma’s Smith Alling, contacted me shortly after I published our article on Gray v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
… DroitDu.NetDouez v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 12:30 pm by Unknown
 "Obstetric Fistula-induced Incontinence and WASH Programming in Humanitarian Settings: Agenda for Research, Innovation, and Practice," Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 8:1 (Jan. 2023)- Authors (4) = Ghana- APC = USD 790"The Politics of Statelessness, Refugeehood and Humanitarianism of the Rohingyas," Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 11 Jan. 2023- Authors (2) = India- APC = USD 1260"La Portée du Principe du Non-refoulement en Droit International,"… [read post]
10 May 2022, 6:29 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Normally, when criminal trials are closed to the public, even for brief time periods, that violates the constitutional right to a public trial, requiring a new trial for the defendant, even if the jury found him guilty.The case is Jordan v. [read post]