Search for: "Kennedy Thomas" Results 861 - 880 of 4,886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2016, 9:23 am by Steve Lubet
Justice Anthony Kennedy took a decidedly "living Constitution" approach to the case, while Justice Clarence Thomas addressed the central issue on originalist grounds. [read post]
15 May 2017, 2:14 pm by The Federalist Society
Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 6:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But Justices Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch and Kavanagh issued a statement in connection with the denial of certiorari. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 11:00 am by Jon Gelman
"KENNEDY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:56 am by Howard Friedman
 Justice Thomas' majority opinion (joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Alito and Sotomayor) concluded that the provisions placing greater restrictions on temporary directional signs than on signs conveying other messages (such as ideological and political signs) "are content-based regulations of speech that cannot survive strict scrutiny. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 6:02 am by Derek T. Muller
Louis, George Washington, Notre Dame (x2), Ohio State, HastingsBreyer (4): Harvard, Chicago, Columbia (x2)O’Connor (4): Yale, Chicago, Emory,** BYURoberts (3): Chicago, Duke, MissouriScalia (3): Columbia, Virginia, RichmondSotomayor (2): Georgetown, Wisconsin*Thomas (2): Notre Dame, George MasonAlito (1): Emory***Clerked for both Ginsburg and Sotomayor in different terms**Clerked for O’Connor and later Alito in the same termColumbia (7): Stevens (x3), Breyer (x2), Scalia,… [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
  Two years ago in Kennedy v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 9:14 am
Justices Scalia and Thomas would overrule Flast. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Thanks to Thomas Riebs for the pointer. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:30 am by Matt Sundquist
  Kirkland focuses on how Justice Kennedy might vote if the Court were to hear the case, and concludes that “in all probability” the Court will eventually hear the case. [read post]
25 May 2010, 7:54 am by Communications and Public Affairs
by Debbie Jonas '10 'Twas the night before Con Law, and though it's quite lateMy mind can't stop thinking of goods interstate.The cases, the issues, the 400 pages,If Wickard is wheat then Garcia is wages.Commerce is dormant and virtues are passive,The casebook is dense and it surely is massive.Powers implied and limits externalStone and his cronies and their textbook infernal.I try to count sheep, but instead I think judges,Scalia's bombastic; Thomas holds… [read post]