Search for: "Lee v. State Bar"
Results 861 - 880
of 950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2011, 6:49 pm
Hilton’s August 3, 2010 decision in The Medicines Company v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 10:54 am
Katyal’s work before the Court was very highly regarded, including his victory in Hamdan v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 6:39 pm
Since our appellate courts have held that the surcharge is "punishment", People v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:59 am
They’re not missing an “a” and a “v” here or there? [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
Updated draft guidelines have not been released by the agencies, but the agencies have stated a goal of releasing new guidelines by the end of this year. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
In American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
Copyright: Baker v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
I must confess that that may set a new bar for resistance to change.) [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Dinwoodie: state of law or practice? [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
These include: CBD pain cream An emu oil salve A tea-like drink with CBD CBD infused drinks from breweries, bars, and cafes Vegetable juices Raw fruits Tinctures Edibles Vape oils Sprays Capsules CBD bars CBD gummies Some people are even using these products for their pets. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:08 am
Md.), John Facciola (D.D.C.), Lee Rosenthal (S.D. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 1:19 am
" BAR/BRI Plaintiffs Firms Take Fee Request Back to the 9th Circuit The National Law Journal Plaintiffs lawyers who obtained a $49 million settlement in an antitrust class action against BAR/BRI's parent company are gearing up for another fight before the 9th Circuit -- this time, over attorney fees. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
A: this is part of the challenge—innovation folks usually don’t have to think about public law and state v. federal. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
Consequently, the court barred the EEOC from seeking relief on behalf of the 67 allegedly aggrieved persons. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:15 am
Indeed, the colloquial "water torture" references in U.S. v. [read post]
