Search for: "Lopez v. United State" Results 861 - 880 of 1,018
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2008, 11:08 am
" The very first example the cert petition offers of such extra-statutory expansion is United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 5:29 pm
" Goldsmith, 526 U.S. at 534; see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Oliveira Ardor New York Senior Broker Associate 2 Gina Berger Lower East End Realty Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales 2 Ariel Toledano ant propeties inc Brokerage - Residential 3 Michael Xylas Xylas & Ziccardi, LLP Real Estate Attorney 3 Tracy Mehlman Marcus and Millichap Brokerage - Residential 3 David Hale 50 State Building Advisors Executive Vice President 3 Venecia DeSilva upscalecorp@yahoo.com investor 2 John Choi … [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 4:45 am
Boston Insulated Wire & Cable Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 8:14 am
Contents include:Symposium: Human Rights in the United StatesDiane Marie Amann, The Course of True Human Rights Progress Never Did Run SmoothCaroline Bettinger-Lopez, Jessica Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:26 pm
Ties go to the respondent in the United States Supreme Court.But ties in Imperial County -- at least in the Employment Appeals Board -- go to the bureaucratic equivalent of overtime. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 5:23 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]