Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 861 - 880
of 3,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:00 pm
DONE at the city of Washington this fourth day of March in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred eighty and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred fourth. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 12:58 pm
Locke Lord’s Privacy & Cybersecurity Newsletter provides topical snapshots of recent developments in the fast-changing world of privacy, data protection, and cyber risk management. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:36 am
Regina v, Crawley, et al., Court of Appeals, May 21, 2014. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:30 am
In something of a coda, Lord Neuberger gave a concurring judgment. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
- For EC Member States, according to Allianz v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:06 am
Lord Toulson stated that denying Mr Hunt his costs and ordering him to pay the other party’s costs could be a serious public interest issue. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:51 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Faith Stewart v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWCA Civ 907 (29 July 2011) Suckrajh, R (on the application of) v The Asylum & Immigration Tribunal & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 938 (29 July 2011) Iqbal v Ahmed [2011] EWCA Civ 900 (29 July 2011) Hayes v Merseyside Police [2011] EWCA Civ 911 (29 July 2011) Austin & Ors v Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 928 (29 July 2011) Modi… [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
DONE at the city of Washington this fifth day of May in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred seventy-six and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundredth. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
The procedural safeguards available to the individual will be especially material in determining whether the respondent State has, when fixing the regulatory framework, remained within its margin of appreciation. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 11:42 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:30 pm
In the case of R (o.t.a P & others) v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 5:15 pm
Lord Neuberger in the Court of Appeal went as far as to state as follows. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:31 am
Lord, I'm ready to go home. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 2:16 am
Supreme Court The appeal was heard before the Supreme Court on 29 June before Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption and Lord Reed. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:13 am
However, neither court commented on whether the EPO’s requirement that an overlapping range should have a technical effect is consistent with the UK novelty requirement established by Lord Hoffmann in Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham plc [2005] UKHL 59. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:08 am
The Defendants relied on an early 20th Century authority of Channell J in Gelmini v Moriggia [1913] 2 KB 549, where it was clearly stated that: “…in all cases of contract the person who has to pay has the whole of the day upon which payment is due in which to pay; therefore until the expiration of that day an action cannot be brought because until then there is no complete cause of action. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:47 am
Huawei (consolidated with Conversant v. [read post]
