Search for: "M/V Lord"
Results 861 - 880
of 914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2008, 5:12 pm
But even if the OCS approach was right, and I’m sure the House of Lords will hear it in Malcolm shortly, that would not stop the DDA having potential application in mandatory possession claims. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 5:12 pm
But even if the OCS approach was right, and I’m sure the House of Lords will hear it in Malcolm shortly, that would not stop the DDA having potential application in mandatory possession claims. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
Brown is almost as dull as Sir (Lord) Alec Douglas- Home and Stanley Baldwin. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 4:21 pm
I’m eagerly awaiting the judgment in R(Weaver) v London & Quadrant, but, in one of those quirks of synchronicity, Bailii has just put the Court of Appeal Judgment in Donoghue v Poplar Housing & Regeneration Community Association Ltd & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 595 up online. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 pm
I'm Megan Connolly and I'm joined here today by my colleague, Rick Bickhram. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:09 pm
But the circumstances in which that might be said to be the case have been highly arguable, and in any case appeared to be quite severely limited by the implications of the care home decision in YL v Birmingham in the House of Lords. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 1:29 am
Regina (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council House of Lords “Where a child had been provided with accommodation by a local authority's housing department but had not come to the attention of its children's services department, she was not entitled to further council support in her own right. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 8:35 am
A couple of recent cases concerning local authorities’ duties under s.20 Childrens Act 1989 R (On The Application of M) (Fc) V London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham Appellate Committee [2008] UKHL 14 concerns the varied responsibilities of Social Services and Housing depts. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 1:16 pm
THE CLAIMANT: Thank you, my Lord. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 1:39 am
Corr (Administratix of The Estate of Thomas Corr (Deceased)) v Ibc Vehicles Limited, Appellate Committee [2008] UKHL 13 (27 February 2008) R (On The Application of M) (Fc) V London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham Appellate Committee [2008] UKHL 14 (27 February 2008) Source: www.parliament.uk [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:11 am
I read the latest filing by the special prosecutors in USA v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:50 pm
House of Lords: Majorstake Limited (Respondents) v Curtis (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 10 on definition of premises in the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 3:28 am
There are four judgments today: none of them really grab me by the throat, but I'm sure they'll interest others. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 5:37 pm
V) MALVEAUX: Congressman Clyburn earlier said today, "I think he can afford to tone it down. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:07 pm
Malcolm is headed to the Lords and frankly, I don’t think anyone expects the Lords to leave it alone, so there is no doubt more to come. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 6:09 am
Sirius Int'l Ins., [2005] EWCA Civ. 601 (per Lord Mance). [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 6:09 am
Sirius Int'l Ins., [2005] EWCA Civ. 601 (per Lord Mance). [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
It was the Lord Justice Richards flashing case which led David Fisher, QC, in defending Sir Stephen Richards, acquitted of flashing at a woman on a crowded commuter train, to ask “the question of 2007″: "In order to remove your penis when you are wearing your Calvin Klein briefs, is it necessary to use one or two hands? [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 1:23 am
Ella v EllaI'm not sure that this one would make my top five. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 3:58 am
I don't propose to go through the law on this point, but yesterday I read the case of Berkeley v Bulliqi [2007] EWCA Civ 1101 (thanks again to Family Law Week), hoping for some enlightenment. [read post]
