Search for: "MATTER OF ADOPTION OF A J R"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,716
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm
§307(j)) to ensure opportunities for small businesses by, among other things, making bidding credits available to them. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:18 pm
See also post, at 2–5 (THOMAS, J., dissenting) (embracing the Government’s argument). [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:03 am
Charlotte Divorce Attorney Matthew R. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:50 pm
[iv] In most policies, the “loss” definition contains language excluding “matters deemed uninsurable under the law pursuant to which this policy is construed. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
R. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:04 am
“A simple explanation for our results,” wrote Stephen Choi, J. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:10 am
Despite the agency's efforts to assist the respondent father to improve his deficient parenting skills and to remediate his propensity for domestic violence, the father's aggressive and threatening behavior continued unabated (see Matter of Nathaniel T., 67 NY2d 838, 841-842 [1986]; see also Matter of Jennifer R., 29 AD3d 1005, 1006 [2006]; Matter of Ajuwon H., 18 AD3d 752 [2005]). [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:28 pm
Graumlich and Gregory J. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm
Kindermann, Katherine J. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
By Tod J. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:59 pm
Hardy, R (on the application of) v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council [2015] EWHC 890 Oh, we have been waiting for this one. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
March 4, 2015 Conaboy, J.), Federal Middle Court Judge Richard P. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
The threshold for issuing a form W-2 is based on dollars – nothing else matters. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
The Court of Appeals in affirming the Appellate Division expressly adopted the construction of section 211 made in Whitcher: The only decisions involving a construction of section 211 to which we have been referred are Matter of Whitcher, 230 App.Div. 239, 243 N.Y.S. 720, and Matter of Deitz's Estate, 134 Misc.Rep.393, 235 N.Y.S. 756. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
R. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
As a factual matter, L.P. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
The Court of Appeals in affirming the Appellate Division expressly adopted the construction of section 211 made in Whitcher: The only decisions involving a construction of section 211 to which we have been referred are Matter of Whitcher, 230 App.Div. 239, 243 N.Y.S. 720, and Matter of Deitz's Estate, 134 Misc.Rep.393, 235 N.Y.S. 756. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
In this regard, some have worried about limitations on the use of ground forces.[2] Others have argued the problem is chiefly the three-year proposed sunset provision.[3] Still others have voiced concerns about both.[4] Yet both concerns are actually misplaced, at least as a legal matter, and for largely the same reasons. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 9:06 am
Mohammed, 441 U.S. 380, 415–16 (1979) (Stevens, J., dissenting). [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
J. [read post]
