Search for: "MATTER OF MOORE" Results 861 - 880 of 3,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It was not a matter of months but years for the successive environments for child sex abuse to be revealed. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:38 pm by Jeremy Saland
For that matter, the District Attorney could offer her a Second Degree Harassment or Disorderly Conduct violation, New York Penal Law 240.26 and 240.20 respectively. [read post]
30 Dec 2017, 4:30 am by Michael Madison
The predecessor of Cravath, Swaine & Moore predated the Langdellian law school, but the Cravath *system* emerged later. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
When historians look back at the copyright worlf in 2017 (if our attention spans allow us to have roles such as a 'historian' in the future!) [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:48 am by LindaMBeale
When right-wing Roy Moore said that the time when America was great was during slavery, he revealed something key to the current GOP members of Congress and state legislatures--their primary goal is to return to a time when owners of property held all the keys to the kingdom and workers were just serfs expected to do as told and whose lives didn't really matter much to the boss capitalists. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 10:30 am
While he has never provided any evidence to substantiate his fallacious claim, it did help prompt him to establish a national voter fraud commission to look into the matter. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:58 am by GUY BLACKWOOD QC, QUADRANT CHAMBERS
”(para 118) Issue 7; receivership orders By a majority of 4:1 (Lord Mance dissenting), the Supreme Court held that the receivership order ought to be restored: Lord Clarke (with whom Lords Sumption, Hodge and Neuberger agreed) held that: > Since the situs of the debts was London, whereas Moore-Bick LJ had been bound to find that the situs was New York, it was open to the Supreme Court to consider the matter afresh (para 53). [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 4:43 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
“But why does any of this matter now,” you may ask, “since Moore lost? [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:24 am by Eugene Volokh
Judge Moore's majority opinion concluded that limits on trademark registration should be treated similarly to limits on speech; in particular, it rejected the analogy between the registration program and various "limited public forums" that the government can open up for private speech but in a content-based (though viewpoint-neutral) way: The government argues that the federal trademark registration program is a limited public forum, subjecting § 2(a)'s… [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 10:00 pm
Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act bars the registration of a trademark that “consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:30 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Doug Jones' upset victory over Roy Moore in the Alabama Senate special election brings Senate Democrats one step closer to retaking control of the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
This would apply, for example, to communications between campaigners about campaign matters and personal conversations and communications. [read post]