Search for: "MINISTER v. STATE"
Results 861 - 880
of 4,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am
United States defamation law has made it famously difficult for claimants to win their cases. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 8:24 pm
For example, in Matar v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm
Canadian Union of Postal Workers applied its recently created new administrative law framework in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:01 am
First, Cambridge PhD student Owen Holland was rusticated for seven terms for reading out a poem that disrupted a speech being given by universities minister, David Willetts. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm
Last summer, the Supreme Court put its money where its mouth was in terms of federalism doctrine in its landmark decision about the Affordable Care Act (ACA), in NFIB v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:10 am
Shahid v Scottish Ministers (Scotland), heard 18 February 2015. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 4:06 pm
While the judgment in Independent Newspapers v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:36 am
The Prime Minister of Canada et al., Federal Court Judge James W. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:02 am
This suggests that in such situations the State may attempt to have the case dismissed on the grounds that it immune from suit in federal court for alleged violations of Title VII in view of the rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States in Kimel v Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 and Alden v Maine, 527 U.S. 706, cases involving employees suing their state employer in federal court for alleged violations of, respectively, the Age Discrimination in… [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 1:34 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 15/11/2021) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 12:21 pm
Trade Minister Andrew Robb announced that Australia would take no part in the U.S. patrols, although Foreign Minister Julie Bishop later said that Australia is “on the same page” with the United States regarding the South China Sea. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:08 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 01/11/2021) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Lloyd v Google LLC, heard 28 and 29 April 2021 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
Until now, the Minister had discretion whether to do so. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:38 am
With so many journalists still in the cabinet (Boris Johnson, Michael Gove, Chris Grayling, Esther McVey), and PPE graduate Matt Hancock as Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, the instinct to work only to a deadline appears to remain strong, notwithstanding the change of Prime Minister. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 6:28 pm
United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:40 am
In the well-known 2005 precedent, Minister of Home Affairs v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
Brown v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
In making the announcement the Minister stated: … Canadian Appeals MonitorKeeping Things in Context: B.C. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:04 pm
Gill v Anagnost, Crews and Grenier (United States) A libel action brought in the New Hampshire state court concerning the posting of defamatory statements on a billboard by mortgage broker Michael Gill. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:19 am
(Eugene Volokh) So holds Mussa v. [read post]
