Search for: "Matter of Adoption of Johnson" Results 861 - 880 of 1,151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2013, 11:00 am by Eric
No matter; the courts recognized--and rejected--the attempt to work around Section 230. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 11:37 am by Daniel Richardson
  This standard was first announced by Justice Blackman of the United States Supreme Court in 1987 and was adopted by the SCOV in State v. [read post]
The ITS also adopted the irrational incidental take surrogate of total vessel distance traveled in the GOM for determining how many listed species would be taken by vessel strikes (which lacks a causal link to the relevant take) and failed to consider where and when those vessels would be traveling (factors which were causally connected). [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
  There are three fundamental reasons why Tinchercannot be read in that fashion.First, to do so would mean that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in a non-drug case, purported to overrule over 70 years of Pennsylvania precedent barring strict liability (or its equivalents) in prescription medical product liability litigation.Second, controlling Pennsylvania law prevents such a radical change in existing law from being made by implication in a case not directly presenting the question.Third, in… [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am by Guest Blogger
Consider, for example the case of Louis Milic, a computational stylistician, who studied the relative frequency of initial determiners and initial connectives in the sentences of Swift, Macaulay, Addison, Gibbon and Samuel Johnson. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:13 pm by David Kopel
"[P]post-ratification adoption or acceptance of laws that are inconsistent with the original meaning of the constitutional text obviously cannot overcome or alter that text. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am by Guest Blogger
Consider, for example the case of Louis Milic, a computational stylistician, who studied the relative frequency of initial determiners and initial connectives in the sentences of Swift, Macaulay, Addison, Gibbon and Samuel Johnson. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
Summary of conclusions reached 5‑year prescription:  awareness of loss, sections 11(3) and 6(4) [5]        While it is possible that losses which were easily identifiable by HC may have occurred in 2007, leading to the triggering of the 5‑year prescription in 2007 (i.e. more than five years before the actions were raised in 2014:  see paragraphs [58] to [61] below), this is a matter of dispute which cannot be resolved on the… [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
Member Schaumber also found it unnecessary to pass on these unfair labor practices found by his colleagues: Supervisor Margeret Johnson's alleged coercive interrogation and threat of job loss of employees Mullanix-Ackerman and Williams; Supervisor Denise Miller's alleged coercive interrogation of Mullanix-Ackerman; and Barroso's threatening employees with unspecified reprisals. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm by Aaron
Schultz: In a plurality opinion authored by Justice Chambers and joined by Justices Sanders, Stephens, James Johnson and Charles Johnson, the Court overturned Ms. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal As GOP Lawmakers Push for More Election Fraud Charges, Prosecutors Find Few Cases MSN – Rosalind Helderman and Amy Gardner (Washington Post) | Published: 3/23/2022 Demands for criminal cases tied to the 2020 election continue to stress the political system and put pressure on prosecutors, particularly elected Republicans. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am by Marty Lederman
  In this post, we try to offer some specificity and clarification with respect to these matters. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 3:00 am by Monica Williamson
NAP supports and approaches tribal sovereignty through litigating and encouraging clients to use their tribal courts and assessing matters through tribal law. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Charles Grassley and Ron Johnson, who led a joint investigation of Hunter Biden this year, are signaling they will take a tough stance on the incoming administration. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
New York,3 that the Supreme Court matter-of-factly held that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment was “of course” applicable to the states.4 To justify incorporation, Penn Central cited only one 19th century case, which itself did not mention the Fifth Amendment.5 Before Penn Central, the Court relied on the Due Process Clause to restrict the scope of state taking power. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:52 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
  Justice Paul Green delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Jefferson, Justice Wainwright, Justice Phil Johnson , and Justice Lehrmann joined. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:04 am by stevemehta
  Defendants thus asserted the matter was required to proceed in arbitration, but Laswell refused to arbitrate the dispute. [read post]