Search for: "Matter of M C B"
Results 861 - 880
of 3,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2017, 9:03 am
Symbolic notice: a statement that I know what I’m doing? [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 11:43 am
by Lawrence C. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 10:04 am
M., & Connolly, D. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:43 am
B. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 5:35 am
Now wait a minute, I have wanted to say to the house-owner who asks me on the phone if I'm Muslim. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:19 am
Green: yes, b/c we believed it was necessary. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 3:28 pm
Panhandling: begging is speech, but courts have long permitted bans anyway b/c they don’t like beggars. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:12 am
Generally, for these exceptions to apply you need: (a) an assailant with some personal animosity (outside of Flonkerton, or whatever Olympic event you are dealing with) toward the victim, (b) someone’s actual intent to injure someone else, or (c) a co-employee’s gross negligence. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 4:06 pm
I'm glad to be back, and thanks to Prawfs for having me. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 3:38 am
Still, I managed to convince (a) the prosecutor to give me a better deal, dropping the 4th degree felony and leaving only a 5th degree, (b) the judge to let Shawn out of jail, and (c) the judge to give Shawn probation if he pled. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:59 am
Farm & City prevailed as a matter of law. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:01 am
Under section 469(c)(7)(B), a taxpayer is a real estate professional if two conditions are satisfied. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 7:48 am
C. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:18 am
” If I’m right on this, then banning assault weapons is likely to have as little effect on mass shootings as banning whiskey would have on drunken driving. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:07 am
First, it cites “230(b)(1)-(2),” which is presumably a wince-inducing typo. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
Original Order and Revision B. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:49 am
FCPA Matters. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:41 am
I/M/O of J.M., __ N.J. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 1:23 pm
Claimant M. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 1:39 am
While there’s a lot of rhetoric about using Rule 23(c)(4) to bypass Rule 23(b)(3), courts are generally doing just fine at rejecting attempts to use Rule 23(c)(4) to certify an otherwise uncertifiable class. [read post]
